2004
DOI: 10.7249/rb7565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agroterrorism: What Is the Threat and What Can Be Done About It?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fifty percent of the responding firms operate in the food industry. The food industry is generally recognized as being more vulnerable, less prepared to deal with a disruption, and more critical to the general population (Harl 2002; Chalk 2003; Voss et al. 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fifty percent of the responding firms operate in the food industry. The food industry is generally recognized as being more vulnerable, less prepared to deal with a disruption, and more critical to the general population (Harl 2002; Chalk 2003; Voss et al. 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fifty percent of the responding firms operate in the food industry. The food industry is generally recognized as being more vulnerable, less prepared to deal with a disruption, and more critical to the general population (Harl 2002;Chalk 2003;Voss et al 2009). The relationship between food firms and the effectiveness of supply chain security is expected to be negative, because food companies are more likely to recognize the vulnerability inherent in their supply chains and because the effects of a disruption may be more severe.…”
Section: Testing Propositionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The serious economic, social, public health and security impacts of a major animal disease outbreak, the inherent vulnerabilities of the livestock sector and perceived advantages of biological weapons compared to other weapons makes agro-terrorism appealing to ill-intended non-state actors (3,9,10). As potential biological weapons, animal pathogens can be easier to obtain, handle and be released with less expertise and technology compared to other unconventional weapons (9,10). Many biological agents are environmentally resistant and are not included in vaccine programs, making them attractive candidates as bioweapons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Simulation studies in the United States suggest that FMD would quickly spread beyond control once it is introduced. 14 The biological, economic, and political impacts of agroterrorism have generated international concern, 15 and since 2005, 4 International Symposia on Agroterrorism (ISA) have been organized. The fourth ISA took place in Kansas City in April 2011, and more than 1,000 individuals from 25 different counties have participated in past ISA meetings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Animal agriculture is a vital part of the economy in many developed countries. According to Chalk, 15 there are at least 3 levels of costs associated with an agroterrorism attack: (1) direct losses resulting from containment measures and the destruction of diseased livestock; (2) compensation costs paid to farmers for the destruction of agricultural commodities and losses suffered by both directly and indirectly related industries; and (3) international costs in the form of protective trade embargoes imposed by major external trading partners. Table 1 gives an overview of direct and indirect costs involved in recent epidemics of notifiable animal diseases and shows that outbreaks of these animal diseases can have a devastating economic impact.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%