1985
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9601(85)90625-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aharonov-Bohm effect versus causality?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This view originates from the path-integral treatments widely used (where the Lagrangian determines directly the phases of Propagators), but, nevertheless, our canonical formulation treatment shows that fields do contribute nonlocally, and they are actually crucial in recovering Relativistic Causality. Moreover, path-integral discussions [16] of the van Kampen case use wave (retarded)-solutions for the vector potentials A (hence they are treated in Lorenz gauge, which is not sufficiently general: even if A…”
Section: Physical Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This view originates from the path-integral treatments widely used (where the Lagrangian determines directly the phases of Propagators), but, nevertheless, our canonical formulation treatment shows that fields do contribute nonlocally, and they are actually crucial in recovering Relativistic Causality. Moreover, path-integral discussions [16] of the van Kampen case use wave (retarded)-solutions for the vector potentials A (hence they are treated in Lorenz gauge, which is not sufficiently general: even if A…”
Section: Physical Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This conclusion originates from the path-integral approach (that is almost always followed), but, nevertheless, our present work shows that fields do contribute nonlocally. A more general discussion on this issue is given in the final Section, after discussion of the van Kampen thought-experiment, and also in connection to related path-integral approaches [16].…”
Section: Comments On the General Behavior Of The (X T)-solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Troudet [12] clearly (and correctly) states that his treatment is good for not highly-delocalized states in space, and that in case of delocalization the proper treatment "would be much more complicated, and would require a much more complete analysis". We believe we have provided one in this paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This view originates from the path-integral treatments widely used (where the Lagrangian determines directly the phases of Propagators), but, nevertheless, our canonical formulation treatment shows that fields do contribute nonlocally, and they are actually crucial in recovering Relativistic Causality. Moreover, path-integral discussions [12] of the van Kampen case use wave (retarded)-solutions for the vector potentials A (hence they are treated in Lorenz gauge, which is not sufficiently general: even if A has not yet reached the screen, we can always add a constant A (a pure gauge) over all space, and there are no more retarded wave-solutions for the potentials, the path-integral resolution of the paradox being, therefore, at least incomplete). Our results are gauge-invariant and take advantage of only the retardation of fields E and B (true in any gauge), and not of potentials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation