Ahogamientos por inmersión no intencional. Análisis de las circunstancias y perfil epidemiológico de las víctimas atendidas en 21 servicios de urgencias españoles

Panzino, F.; Quintilla, José M.; Luaces, Carles; Pou, Jordi

doi:10.1016/j.anpedi.2012.06.014

Cited by 15 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In the first study, 369 56/73 (77%) submerged for less than10 minutes survived compared with none of the 7 patients who were submerged for more prolonged periods survived (RR, not estimable; absolute difference, 76.7%; 95% CI, 39.7%-94.9%). The second study 382 also noted better survival rates associated with a submersion duration of less than 10 minutes (46/50 [96%] survived) compared with submersion duration of more than 10 minutes (2/5 [40%] survived). 382…”

Section: Intermediate Submersion Intervals (Less Than 10 Minutes)mentioning

confidence: 86%

“…The second study 382 also noted better survival rates associated with a submersion duration of less than 10 minutes (46/50 [96%] survived) compared with submersion duration of more than 10 minutes (2/5 [40%] survived). 382…”

Section: Intermediate Submersion Intervals (Less Than 10 Minutes)mentioning

confidence: 86%

“…For the critical outcome of survival, we identified lowcertainty evidence (downgraded for bias, indirectness and imprecision; upgraded for dose response) from 2 observational studies 369,382 reporting about 121 victims of drowning. In the first study, 369 56/73 (77%) submerged for less than10 minutes survived compared with none of the 7 patients who were submerged for more prolonged periods survived (RR, not estimable; absolute difference, 76.7%; 95% CI, 39.7%-94.9%).…”

Section: Intermediate Submersion Intervals (Less Than 10 Minutes)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Adult Basic Life Support: 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations

Olasveengen¹,

Mancini²,

Perkins³

et al. 2020

Circulation

178

177

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations on basic life support summarizes evidence evaluations performed for 22 topics that were prioritized by the Basic Life Support Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. The evidence reviews include 16 systematic reviews, 5 scoping reviews, and 1 evidence update. Per agreement within the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation, new or revised treatment recommendations were only made after a systematic review. Systematic reviews were performed for the following topics: dispatch diagnosis of cardiac arrest, use of a firm surface for CPR, sequence for starting CPR (compressions-airway-breaths versus airway-breaths-compressions), CPR before calling for help, duration of CPR cycles, hand position during compressions, rhythm check timing, feedback for CPR quality, alternative techniques, public access automated external defibrillator programs, analysis of rhythm during chest compressions, CPR before defibrillation, removal of foreign-body airway obstruction, resuscitation care for suspected opioid-associated emergencies, drowning, and harm from CPR to victims not in cardiac arrest. The topics that resulted in the most extensive task force discussions included CPR during transport, CPR before calling for help, resuscitation care for suspected opioid-associated emergencies, feedback for CPR quality, and analysis of rhythm during chest compressions. After discussion of the scoping reviews and the evidence update, the task force prioritized several topics for new systematic reviews.

show abstract

Section: Intermediate Submersion Intervals (Less Than 10 Minutes)mentioning

confidence: 86%

Section: Intermediate Submersion Intervals (Less Than 10 Minutes)mentioning

confidence: 86%

Section: Intermediate Submersion Intervals (Less Than 10 Minutes)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Adult Basic Life Support: 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations

Olasveengen¹,

Mancini²,

Perkins³

et al. 2020

Circulation

178

177

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…En nuestro medio, las lesiones por caídas atendidas en los Servicios de Urgencia de Pediatría presentan mayor prevalencia que las intoxicaciones 11,12 , ahogamientos 13 , caídas de bicicleta 14 o atropellos por vehículos de motor 15 .…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Epidemiology and risk factors in injuries due to fall in infants under one year-old

Domingo

García

Pardillo

et al. 2017

Anales de Pediatría (English Edition)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…For the critical outcome of survival, we identified low-certainty evidence (downgraded for bias indirectness and imprecision; upgraded for dose response) from 2 observational studies 369 , 382 reporting about 121 victims of drowning. In the first study, 369 56/73 (77%) submerged for less than10 minutes survived compared with none of the 7 patients who were submerged for more prolonged periods survived (RR, not estimable; absolute difference, 76.7%; 95% CI, 39.7%–94.9%).…”

Section: Special Circumstancesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Adult Basic Life Support

Berg¹,

Soar²,

Andersen³

et al. 2020

Resuscitation

101

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations on basic life support summarizes evidence evaluations performed for 20 topics that were prioritized by the Basic Life Support Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. The evidence reviews include 16 systematic reviews, 3 scoping reviews, and 1 evidence update. Per agreement within the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation, new or revised treatment recommendations were only made after a systematic review. Systematic reviews were performed for the following topics: dispatch diagnosis of cardiac arrest, use of a firm surface for CPR, sequence for starting CPR (compressions-airway-breaths versus airway-breaths-compressions), CPR before calling for help, duration of CPR cycles, hand position during compressions, rhythm check timing, feedback for CPR quality, alternative techniques, public access automated external defibrillator programs, analysis of rhythm during chest compressions, CPR before defibrillation, removal of foreign-body airway obstruction, resuscitation care for suspected opioid-associated emergencies, drowning, and harm from CPR to victims not in cardiac arrest. The topics that resulted in the most extensive task force discussions included CPR during transport, CPR before calling for help, resuscitation care for suspected opioid-associated emergencies, feedback for CPR quality, and analysis of rhythm during chest compressions. After discussion of the scoping reviews and the evidence update, the task force prioritized several topics for new systematic reviews.

show abstract

Ahogamientos por inmersión no intencional. Análisis de las circunstancias y perfil epidemiológico de las víctimas atendidas en 21 servicios de urgencias españoles

Cited by 15 publications

References 18 publications

Adult Basic Life Support: 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations

Adult Basic Life Support: 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations

Epidemiology and risk factors in injuries due to fall in infants under one year-old

Adult Basic Life Support

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About