2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-007-1097-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ahp model for the selection of partner companies in virtual enterprises

Abstract: Rising product variety and complexity, shorter time frames to respond, and the continual need to gain new capabilities through innovativeness force the trend of outsourcing to be replaced by strategic alliances, where enterprises or individuals work together towards a common goal and share their responsibilities as well as their profits. Recent developments in information technology have enabled relatively inexpensive, reliable and fast networking to support such alliances in real time. In this context, the vi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…goal programming (Hajidimitriou andGeorgiou 2002, Famuyiwa et al 2008), integer programming (Wu and Su 2005), and their enhanced types (Jarimo and Salo 2009); (3) fuzzy decisionmaking and multi-attributive decision-making (MADM) algorithms, e.g. analytic network process (ANP) (Chen et al 2008), analytical hierarchy process (AHP) (Sari et al 2008), fuzzy-AHP approach (Chan et al 2008), Technique for Order Performance by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) (Ye and Li 2009), fuzzy preference programming (Wang and Chen 2007), etc. ;and (4) heuristic and meta-heuristic algorithms, e.g.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…goal programming (Hajidimitriou andGeorgiou 2002, Famuyiwa et al 2008), integer programming (Wu and Su 2005), and their enhanced types (Jarimo and Salo 2009); (3) fuzzy decisionmaking and multi-attributive decision-making (MADM) algorithms, e.g. analytic network process (ANP) (Chen et al 2008), analytical hierarchy process (AHP) (Sari et al 2008), fuzzy-AHP approach (Chan et al 2008), Technique for Order Performance by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) (Ye and Li 2009), fuzzy preference programming (Wang and Chen 2007), etc. ;and (4) heuristic and meta-heuristic algorithms, e.g.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, partner selection approaches do not use mixed types of variables, rather applying a single type of variables: only fuzzy numbers (e.g., Cao and Zhou 2006), or linguist terms (e.g., Lin et al 2007), or numbers, indexes and ratios (e.g., Sari et al 2007). In cases where an attempt to use quantitative and qualitative information together was made, approaches are usually rather inflexible, requiring for example the fixation of the scale cardinality (e.g., # ¼ 9 scale or a five-point like scale (Araz et al 2007)).…”
Section: Multiple Criteria Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general the DM has to define the weights of each criterion (see, e.g., Lin et al 2007, Sari et al 2007, Bu¨yu¨ko¨zkan et al 2008 as input data to the model, in a phase where not all relevant information is available or trustable. Moreover, the decision-maker's objectives and aspirations may change during the stage when the decision process is being structured.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…usually a human) with good knowledge about companies was employed as a driving force for searching and recognizing market opportunities, planning and drafting collaboration, and estimating costs and revenues. In the current situation it is really difficult to handle the information about all the collaborative firms and thus, it becomes necessary to model the knowledge in a form that is manageable and addressable [57]. An ECOS model can be used here to capture domain knowledge and establish a consistent vocabulary which can be easily interpreted by the system as well as humans.…”
Section: Partner Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%