AI did not write this manuscript, or did it? Can we trick the AI text detector into generated texts? The potential future of ChatGPT and AI in Sports &amp; Exercise Medicine manuscript generation

Anderson, Nash; Belavý, Daniel L.; Perle, Stephen M.; Hendricks, Sharief; Hespanhol, Luiz; Verhagen, Evert; Memon, Aamir Raoof

doi:10.1136/bmjsem-2023-001568

Cited by 132 publications

(89 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…We searched MEDLINE on March 4, 2023, using the combination of the following two terms: ChatGPT AND Sport. Only two editorials were found [ 23 , 24 ]. The use of ChatGPT in academic research, including sports science, has both advantages and disadvantages that are not fundamentally different from other academic fields.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing

Dergaa¹,

Chamari²,

Żmijewski³

et al. 2023

292

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Natural language processing (NLP) has been studied in computing for decades. Recent technological advancements have led to the development of sophisticated artificial intelligence (AI) models, such as Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT). These models can perform a range of language tasks and generate human-like responses, which offers exciting prospects for academic efficiency. This manuscript aims at (i) exploring the potential benefits and threats of ChatGPT and other NLP technologies in academic writing and research publications; (ii) highlights the ethical considerations involved in using these tools, and (iii) consider the impact they may have on the authenticity and credibility of academic work. This study involved a literature review of relevant scholarly articles published in peer-reviewed journals indexed in Scopus as quartile 1. The search used keywords such as “ChatGPT,” “AI-generated text,” “academic writing,” and “natural language processing.” The analysis was carried out using a quasi-qualitative approach, which involved reading and critically evaluating the sources and identifying relevant data to support the research questions. The study found that ChatGPT and other NLP technologies have the potential to enhance academic writing and research efficiency. However, their use also raises concerns about the impact on the authenticity and credibility of academic work. The study highlights the need for comprehensive discussions on the potential use, threats, and limitations of these tools, emphasizing the importance of ethical and academic principles, with human intelligence and critical thinking at the forefront of the research process. This study highlights the need for comprehensive debates and ethical considerations involved in their use. The study also recommends that academics exercise caution when using these tools and ensure transparency in their use, emphasizing the importance of human intelligence and critical thinking in academic work.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing

Dergaa¹,

Chamari²,

Żmijewski³

et al. 2023

292

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Plagiarism concerns arise from copyright issues, and AI has been previously known in journalism for plagiarism. As a result, the ethics of using ChatGPT to generate scientific articles have been widely discussed (Anderson et al, 2023). Plagiarism is not limited to copying text but also includes paraphrasing text, methods, graphics, ideas, and any other product of intelligence that belongs to another person (Gasparyan et al, 2017).…”

Section: Ethical Issues With Using Chatgpt For Scholarly Publishingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Some publishers are considering removing open-access scientific research papers to prevent AI, such as ChatGPT, from accessing the articles, in an attempt to mitigate ethical concerns (Anderson et al, 2023). However, if publicly funded research and relevant papers are not available to the public, it may lead to different ethical discussions about open access policies (Dehouche, 2021).…”

Section: Authorship Copyright and Plagiarismmentioning

confidence: 99%

ChatGPTand a new academic reality:Artificial Intelligence‐writtenresearch papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing

Lund

Wang

Mannuru

et al. 2023

Asso for Info Science & Tech

397

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article discusses OpenAI's ChatGPT, a generative pre-trained transformer, which uses natural language processing to fulfill text-based user requests (i.e., a "chatbot"). The history and principles behind ChatGPT and similar models are discussed. This technology is then discussed in relation to its potential impact on academia and scholarly research and publishing. ChatGPT is seen as a potential model for the automated preparation of essays and other types of scholarly manuscripts. Potential ethical issues that could arise with the emergence of large language models like GPT-3, the underlying technology behind ChatGPT, and its usage by academics and researchers, are discussed and situated within the context of broader advancements in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and natural language processing for research and scholarly publishing.

show abstract

“…Of course, it can be used to generate simple text and to produce code snippets (but often with errors). It can even quickly analyze a research topic and generate an academic paper-again, with frequent errors that may go unnoticed even by reviewers and editors of scientific journals (11). This application may be helpful for student assignments but will not be of much use for learning, in which an individual must come up with a solution through a step-by-step thought process.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

An Opinion on ChatGPT in Health Care—Written by Humans Only

Kleesiek¹,

Štiglic

et al. 2023

J Nucl Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AI did not write this manuscript, or did it? Can we trick the AI text detector into generated texts? The potential future of ChatGPT and AI in Sports & Exercise Medicine manuscript generation

Cited by 132 publications

References 4 publications

From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing

From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing

ChatGPTand a new academic reality:Artificial Intelligence‐writtenresearch papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing

An Opinion on ChatGPT in Health Care—Written by Humans Only

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About