2022
DOI: 10.1007/s43681-021-00129-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AI ethics and systemic risks in finance

Abstract: The paper suggests that AI ethics should pay attention to morally relevant systemic effects of AI use. It draws the attention of ethicists and practitioners to systemic risks that have been neglected so far in professional AI-related codes of conduct, industrial standards and ethical discussions more generally. The paper uses the financial industry as an example to ask: how can AI-enhanced systemic risks be ethically accounted for? Which specific issues does AI use raise for ethics that takes systemic effects … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 62 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, efforts to establish standards for AI have revealed significant patterns of collaboration among technical experts from various geopolitical backgrounds on technical AI standards, while governments show less willingness to collaborate on global ethical AI standards (Ingersleben-Seip, 2023). This dichotomy highlights the necessity of multi-stakeholder consultations and crosssectional feedback in developing actionable AI ethical principles, as emphasized by Svetlova (2022) (Svetlova, 2022).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, efforts to establish standards for AI have revealed significant patterns of collaboration among technical experts from various geopolitical backgrounds on technical AI standards, while governments show less willingness to collaborate on global ethical AI standards (Ingersleben-Seip, 2023). This dichotomy highlights the necessity of multi-stakeholder consultations and crosssectional feedback in developing actionable AI ethical principles, as emphasized by Svetlova (2022) (Svetlova, 2022).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%