2019 Third International Conference on I-Smac (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud) (I-Smac) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/i-smac47947.2019.9032621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AI-Powered Image-Based Tomato Leaf Disease Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies were conducted in the literature on the application of machine learning and deep learning algorithms for the identification and classification of plant diseases. Some of these studies (e.g., Hlaing and Zaw [11] and Annabel and Muthulakshmi [14]) used the traditional approach of employing image processing techniques to segment the input images (i.e., separation of the leaf or infected area from the background) and to extract texture features that reflect the disease state of the leaf. These features form the input for non-deep traditional machine learning algorithms (e.g., SVM).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several studies were conducted in the literature on the application of machine learning and deep learning algorithms for the identification and classification of plant diseases. Some of these studies (e.g., Hlaing and Zaw [11] and Annabel and Muthulakshmi [14]) used the traditional approach of employing image processing techniques to segment the input images (i.e., separation of the leaf or infected area from the background) and to extract texture features that reflect the disease state of the leaf. These features form the input for non-deep traditional machine learning algorithms (e.g., SVM).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Tm et al [13] used the AlexNet, GoogleNet, and LeNet models for the same classification problem and achieved an accuracy range of 94-95%. Annabel and Muthulakshmi [14] used masking and threshold-based segmentation to identify and isolate infected areas of a leaf image. They extracted several features (e.g., dissimilarity, homogeneity, and contrast) and used a random forest classifier to category 3 diseases plus healthy leaves with an accuracy of 94.1%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sherly Pushpa et al [10] Rao et al [11] studied large-scale farming through IoT and data analytics, addressing rising power consumption with a centralized sensor control unit. Zigbee connectivity was found to be superior to Wi-Fi, highlighting the potential of centralized platforms.…”
Section: Sensor Network and Agriculturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…With an accuracy percentage of 87.20%, MLBPNN is the most accurate algorithm. Annabel et al 10 13 to use a pretrained deep learning architecture that included transfer learning concepts, in particular AlexNet and VGG16, to extract characteristics from photos of tomatoes and categorize them as either healthy or unhealthy. In terms of accuracy in classification, AlexNet and VGG16 score 97.49% and 97.23%, respectively.…”
Section: Overview Of Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%