Aiding multi-level decision-making processes for climate change mitigation and adaptation

Abstract

Paper accepted for the journal "Regional Environmental Change" 15/08/2010Abstract Progress towards climate change aware regional sustainable development is affected by actions at multiple spatial scales and governance levels, and equally impacts actions at these scales. Many authors and policy practitioners consider therefore that decisions over policy, mitigation strategies and capacity for adaptation to climate change require construction and coordination over multiple levels of governance to arrive at acceptable local, regional and global management strategies. However, how such processes of coordination and decision-aiding can occur and be maintained and improved over time is a major challenge in need of investigation. We take on this challenge by proposing research-supported methods of aiding multi-level decision-making processes in this context. Four example regionally-focussed multi-level case studies from diverse socio-political contexts are outlined -estuarine management in Australia's Lower Hawkesbury, flood and drought management in Bulgaria's Upper Iskar Basin, climate policy integration in Spain's Comunidad Valenciana, and food security in Bangladesh's Faridpur Districtfrom which insights are drawn. Our discussion focuses on exploring these insights including: (1) the possible advantages of informal research-supported processes, and specifically those that provide individual arenas of participation for different levels of stakeholders; (2) the complexity of organisation processes required for aiding multi-level decision-making processes; and (3) to what extent progress towards integrated regional policies for climate change aware sustainable development can be achieved through research-supported processes. We finish with a speculative section that provides ideas and directions for future research.

Multi-level Governance: Conceptual challenges and case studies from Australia

“…Commentators note that it is not only democratic legitimacy issues that are driving open and inclusive approaches to policy development, but also the need to develop implementable policies that have the best chance of being successful while minimising unintended consequences. This is as the knowledge, resources and authority to make and implement decisions are increasingly dispersed between a large range of stakeholders, including different levels of government, management bodies, research organisations, private companies, non-government organisations and the general public (Rhodes 1988;Fischer 2000;Daniell et al 2010aDaniell et al , 2010b. Mike Oliver's (1990; work on disability policy, following the adage of nothing about us without us, 5 serves as an excellent example of this work from the perspective of an international movement.…”

Breaking Down the ‘One-Size-Fits-All’ Approach to Rural and Regional Policy: Enhancing Policy Initiatives through Multi-level Governance

“…Commentators note that it is not only democratic legitimacy issues that are driving open and inclusive approaches to policy development, but also the need to develop implementable policies that have the best chance of being successful while minimising unintended consequences. This is as the knowledge, resources and authority to make and implement decisions are increasingly dispersed between a large range of stakeholders, including different levels of government, management bodies, research organisations, private companies, non-government organisations and the general public (Rhodes 1988;Fischer 2000;Daniell et al 2010aDaniell et al , 2010b. Mike Oliver's (1990;1996) work on disability policy, following the adage of nothing about us without us, 5 serves as an excellent example of this work from the perspective of an international movement.…”

Participatory analysis for adaptation to climate change in Mediterranean agricultural systems: possible choices in process design

“…Preliminary workshops can also be held separately with the aim of building the participants' capacities, so that later, when a joint workshop is held, social learning can take place (Daniell et al 2011, Imache et al 2009). …”