Aiming for Cognitive Equivalence – Mental Models as a Tertium Comparationis for Translation and Empirical Semantics

Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p> This paper introduces my concept of cognitive equivalence (cf. Mandelblit, 1997), an attempt to reconcile elements of Nida’s dynamic equivalence with recent innovations in cognitive linguistics and cognitive psychology, and building on the current focus on translators’ mental processes in translation studies (see e.g. Göpferich et al., 2009, Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, 2010; Halverson, 2014). My approach shares its general impetus with Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk’s concept of re-conceptualization, but is independently derived from findings in cognitive linguistics and simulation theory (see e.g. Langacker, 2008; Feldman, 2006; Barsalou, 1999; Zwaan, 2004). Against this background, I propose a model of translation processing focused on the internal simulation of reader reception and the calibration of these simulations to achieve similarity between ST and TT impact. The concept of cognitive equivalence is exemplarily tested by exploring a conceptual / lexical field (MALE BALDNESS) through the way that English, German and Japanese lexical items in this field are linked to matching visual-conceptual representations by native speaker informants. The visual data gathered via this empirical method can be used to effectively triangulate the linguistic items involved, enabling an extra-linguistic comparison across languages. Results show that there is a reassuring level of interinformant agreement within languages, but that the conceptual domain for BALDNESS is linguistically structured in systematically different ways across languages. The findings are interpreted as strengthening the call for a cognition-focused, embodied approach to translation.</jats:p>

Mapping translation process research: A bibliographic study on special issues since year 2005

“…Over the last decade, scholars in translation studies as well as from other fields have applied the above-mentioned cross-disciplinary theories and methodologies to investigate translation processes. Recent efforts have been invested to such topics related to TPR as cognitive effort (Lin et al, 2018), attention or working memory (Kosma, 2007), emotion (Hubscher-Davidson, 2018), creativity (Cho, 2006), and translation competence (Sickinger, 2017), to name just a few. TPR has seen an upsurge over time, as evidenced by numerous publications in various forms (e.g., monographs, edited books, and journal articles Sun and Xiao, 2019).…”

Translating Cognitive and Linguistic Metaphors in Popular Science: A Case Study of Scientific Discoveries

“…In the same vein, this idea has been developed by translation scholars to revisit some of the classical topics in translation studies, such as '(cognitive) equivalence,' as featured in Mohammad Q. Al-Zoubi, Mohammed N. Al-Ali, and Ali R. Al-Hasnawi (2007) and Pawel Sickinger (2017), among others.…”

Models of Translation in the Translation Theory

“…Художні концепти як складники концептуальної картини світу в літературному творі, що втілюють індивідуально-авторське світобачення, відрізняються від концептів культури та мовних концептів, на думку В.Г. Ніконової 25 , за кількома параметрами: за змістом і способом експлікації, обсягом та історичною мінливістю. Виявлення контекстуальних утілень художнього концепту (Т.В.…”