1950
DOI: 10.1001/jama.1950.82910520002008a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Air Embolism in Blood Donors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1958
1958
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The phrase “primum non nocere,” Latin for “above all, do no harm,” has been a golden rule in medicine since it was founded by English physician Thomas Sydenham in the 1860s 18 . Hence, determining the risk of iatrogenic harm to the donor was an important outcome in this study, considering that air embolisms in both donor and patient was a known complication before the time of plastic infusion bags 19,20 . On the background of this risk, the BC 2 L was designed with a venting port connected to a three‐way stop cock, allowing for potential overpressure to escape the bottle before the needle is introduced to the donor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The phrase “primum non nocere,” Latin for “above all, do no harm,” has been a golden rule in medicine since it was founded by English physician Thomas Sydenham in the 1860s 18 . Hence, determining the risk of iatrogenic harm to the donor was an important outcome in this study, considering that air embolisms in both donor and patient was a known complication before the time of plastic infusion bags 19,20 . On the background of this risk, the BC 2 L was designed with a venting port connected to a three‐way stop cock, allowing for potential overpressure to escape the bottle before the needle is introduced to the donor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…18 Hence, determining the risk of iatrogenic harm to the donor was an important outcome in this study, considering that air embolisms in both donor and patient was a known complication before the time of plastic infusion bags. 19,20 On the background of this risk, the BC 2 L was designed with a venting port connected to a three-way stop cock, allowing for potential overpressure to escape the bottle before the needle is introduced to the donor. Throughout this trial we did not encounter any occurrences of backflow or any other safety concerns for the donor.…”
Section: What Are the Risks Of Causing Iatrogenic Harm To The Donor?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For air embolism to result in a fatality, large volumes (200 mL plus) of air are required [45]. Fatalities associated with the use of older apheresis technology occurred in the 1940s/1950s due to positive pressure in the circuit, resulting in air being sucked into the circulation [46]. Modern apheresis machines make significant air embolism unlikely given standard alarms and inbuilt controls.…”
Section: Air Embolismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An evacuated bottle was used for the draw. 52 Donating blood using an evacuated container carried a serious risk of death or impairment. As instructed, the patient began to open and close his fist to enhance flow, but this was unsuccessful.…”
Section: Phlebotomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…52 Reverse flow (ie, air from bottle retrogrades into the needle) can be achieved even with the tourniquet in place, but the risk becomes explosive if the tourniquet is released while the needle remains open and in the patient's arm. As blood enters a non-vacuum-sealed bottle, air pressure builds up.…”
Section: Phlebotomymentioning
confidence: 99%