2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:aero.0000022988.36891.9b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aırborne pollen calendar of Bartın, Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…distribution of the local vegetation and rate of the pollen production. Same results are also found in other studies caried out in Turkey, Ankara (76%) (İnceoğlu et al 1994), Balıkesir (70.92%) (Bicakci and Akyalcin 2000), Isparta (71%) (Bıçakcı et al 2000), Zonguldak 94% (Kaplan 2004), Yalova (80.50%) (Altunoğlu et al 2004), Bartın (72.8 %) (Kaya and Aras 2004), (69 %) (Özveren 2005), Eskişehir (81%) (Potoğlu Erkara et al 2007), Trabzon (59.2%) (Ayvaz et al 2008) When the main pollination period of the various types determined in Karabük is considered, it can be seen that Table 3. Total monthly concentrations of arboreal (AP) pollen grains in two years study period.…”
Section: Pollen Typesupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…distribution of the local vegetation and rate of the pollen production. Same results are also found in other studies caried out in Turkey, Ankara (76%) (İnceoğlu et al 1994), Balıkesir (70.92%) (Bicakci and Akyalcin 2000), Isparta (71%) (Bıçakcı et al 2000), Zonguldak 94% (Kaplan 2004), Yalova (80.50%) (Altunoğlu et al 2004), Bartın (72.8 %) (Kaya and Aras 2004), (69 %) (Özveren 2005), Eskişehir (81%) (Potoğlu Erkara et al 2007), Trabzon (59.2%) (Ayvaz et al 2008) When the main pollination period of the various types determined in Karabük is considered, it can be seen that Table 3. Total monthly concentrations of arboreal (AP) pollen grains in two years study period.…”
Section: Pollen Typesupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In Turkey, aeropalynological studies are gradually gaining more importance from year to year (Karamanoğlu and Özkaragöz 1968, Aytuğ 1974, Yurdukoru 1979, İnceoğlu et al 1994, Özler and Pehlivan 1995, Bicakci et al 1996, Bicakci et al 1999, Pınar et al 1999, Bicakci et al 2000a,b,c, 2002, Güvensen and Öztürk 2002, Kaplan 2004, Kaya and Aras 2004, Türe and Salkurt 2005, Potoğlu Erkara et al 2007, Toraman 2007, Boyacıoğlu et al 2007, Ayvaz et al 2008, Türe and Böcük 2009, Bılışık et al 2008, Kızılpınar and Doğan 2010, Çeter et al 2012, Kaplan and Serbes 2014.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aeropalinological studies in Turkey have been conducted in Marmara, Mediterranean, Aegean, Black Sea Regions and Central Anatolia (Bıçakçı et al 2000(Bıçakçı et al , 2002(Bıçakçı et al , 2003(Bıçakçı et al , 2004Çelik et al 2005;Gemici et al 1989;Güvensen and Özturk 2002;İnce 1994;İnceoğlu et al 1994;Kaplan 2004;Kaya and Aras 2004;Pehlivan 1995;Pınar et al 1999). This is the first research conducted on determining airborne fungal flora concentration in the province of İzmir.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aeropalynological studies undertaken by gravimetric (G) or volumetric (V) methods on the distribution of arboreal pollen in Ankara (Pinar et al, 1999); Rize, Afyon, and Bursa (Bıçakçı et al, 2002;Bicakci et al, 2002Bicakci et al, , 2003; İzmir (Guvensen & Ozturk, 2003); Zonguldak (Kaplan, 2004); Bartın (Kaya & Aras, 2004); Manisa (Ay et al, 2005); Denizli (Celik et al, 2005); Bitlis (Celenk & Bicakci, 2005); Çanakkale (Guvensen et al, 2005); Sakarya (Bicakci, 2006); and İstanbul (Celenk et al, 2010) show that although percentage values differ from the present data, in general, the values of arboreal (39.39%-94%) taxa are higher than those of nonarboreal (6.00%-59.28%) ones (Table 3). An evaluation of the data obtained both qualitatively as well as quantitatively revealed that the reason for the dominance of arboreal atmospheric pollen types in the region is the presence of many shrubs and tree taxa producing large quantities of pollen (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%