2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10766-018-0602-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aircraft Landing Scheduling Using Embedded Flower Pollination Algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They stated that the hybrid versions also show good results in different applications in combination with modified and other algorithms. Mahmud and Jeberson 31 showed that the FPA approach is also applicable in aviation. The researchers who applied the FPA to the aircraft landing schedule problem compared it with other approaches like KH and Cuckoo search and found that the FPA performed better.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They stated that the hybrid versions also show good results in different applications in combination with modified and other algorithms. Mahmud and Jeberson 31 showed that the FPA approach is also applicable in aviation. The researchers who applied the FPA to the aircraft landing schedule problem compared it with other approaches like KH and Cuckoo search and found that the FPA performed better.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of landing scheduling has been also considered in applications of nature-inspired algorithms. Some research suggests applying flower pollination for this problem [507,508], while others focus on GWO [509] and harmony search algorithm [510]. Abdul-Razaq and Ali have also used the bees algorithm to provide a nature-inspired landing scheduling for aircraft [511].…”
Section: Optimal Guidance and Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Publication Year Application Algorithm [481] 2022 Path and motion planning PSO [482] 2019 Path and motion planning ACO [483] 2020 Path and motion planning DE [484] 2023 Path and motion planning GWO [485] 2021 Path and motion planning GA [486] 2019 Path and motion planning BA [487] 2020 Target tracking BA [488] 2017 Optimal Control BA [489] 2013 Optimal Landing BA [490] 2017 Route evaluation CSA [491] 2019 Trajectory tracking CS [492] 2019 Trajectory planning CS [493] 2011 Path and motion planning DE, PSO, GA [494] 2005 Path and motion planning DE [495] 2016 Path and motion planning FAO, DE, PSO, GA [496] 2022 Path and motion planning FAO, DE [497] 2022 Trajectory planning FPA [498] 2012 Path and motion planning GSA [499] 2020 Path and motion planning GWO [500] 2022 Path and motion planning BOA [504] 2023 Drone-Truck path planning WWO, GA, PSO, DE, BBO, EBO [505] 2020 Optimal landing MFO, BOA, ABC [506] 2021 Optimal landing DFO, DE [507] 2020 Optimal landing FPA [508] 2018 Optimal landing FPA [509] 2021 Optimal landing GWO [510] 2017 Optimal landing HS [511] 2014 Optimal landing BA [512] 2008 Optimal landing CSA [513,514] 2019 Optimal space trajectory GA, PSO, ACO [516] 2015 Optimal space trajectory GSA [517] 2020 Optimal space control FAO [518] 2016 Optimal trajectory FAO [519] 2016 Air traffic control GSA [520] 2019 Trajectory tracking GWO…”
Section: Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the time-varying demand and time-varying operation time of air traffic, an air traffic congestion mitigation scheme is proposed based on the performance model of mixed operation runway system. These models are quite different from the flight sequencing models considered in literature [20][21][22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%