2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-32147-4_25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aircraft Sequencing Problems via a Rolling Horizon Algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The total runtime to solve all problem instances to optimality was 64 milliseconds, or on average 5.3ms per problem instance. This equates to a speedup by a factor of 37170 relative to the runtimes reported in Table 4 Optimal results for the benchmark instances introduced by Furini et al (2012).…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total runtime to solve all problem instances to optimality was 64 milliseconds, or on average 5.3ms per problem instance. This equates to a speedup by a factor of 37170 relative to the runtimes reported in Table 4 Optimal results for the benchmark instances introduced by Furini et al (2012).…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in order to meet computing time limits for instances of practical interest, big-M MIP approaches typically need to resort to some sort of heuristic decomposition of the problem (for instance, rolling horizon, see e.g. Furini et al (2012) and SamĂ  et al (2013)), and the overall algorithm boils down to a heuristic method.…”
Section: Management (Dman) Arrival Management (Aman) and Surface Manmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in many practical contexts, larger sizes can still provide satisfactory solutions, allowing for drastic reductions in computing times. For example, in Furini et al (2012) the step size is 60 seconds for all instances. In Heidt et al (2013), in the same instance the authors resort to two distinct step sizes, namely 5 seconds for (the first) 10 airplanes and 75 seconds for the remaining ones.…”
Section: Management (Dman) Arrival Management (Aman) and Surface Manmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gavranis and Kozanidis [3] designed the flight assignment algorithm with flight delay. Furini et al [4] optimized the flight sequencing problem using a rolling horizon algorithm. In [5], a rolling horizon algorithm is proposed for the aircraft landing sequence problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%