17th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/itsc.2014.6958115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Airport surface trajectory optimization considering runway exit selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another widely adopted modeling strategy involves a sequential procedure in which the route allocation problem (that assigns a specific path for each aircraft) is first solved, and a scheduling problem is subsequently solved to compute the time spent by an aircraft on each arc such that all taxiway conflicts among aircraft are avoided (Gupta et al, 2010; Pesic et al, 2001). Research efforts that consider the taxiway route allocation and scheduling problems simultaneously include: Godbole et al (2017), who proposed an exact branch‐and‐bound algorithm to simultaneously solve small‐scale route allocation and scheduling problems (with a maximum of 8 aircraft); Marin (2006) and Marin and Codina (2008), who proposed a time–space network model that only considered capacity constraints at the taxiway intersections; and Cheng et al (2014), who considered taxiway conflict in their study, while ignoring the possibility of head‐on and rear‐end collisions at the taxiway. A three step heuristic sequential approach was proposed by Guépet et al (2017), where the earliest runway arrival time for departure flights and the earliest gate arrival time for arrival flights were estimated first and used to sequence take offs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another widely adopted modeling strategy involves a sequential procedure in which the route allocation problem (that assigns a specific path for each aircraft) is first solved, and a scheduling problem is subsequently solved to compute the time spent by an aircraft on each arc such that all taxiway conflicts among aircraft are avoided (Gupta et al, 2010; Pesic et al, 2001). Research efforts that consider the taxiway route allocation and scheduling problems simultaneously include: Godbole et al (2017), who proposed an exact branch‐and‐bound algorithm to simultaneously solve small‐scale route allocation and scheduling problems (with a maximum of 8 aircraft); Marin (2006) and Marin and Codina (2008), who proposed a time–space network model that only considered capacity constraints at the taxiway intersections; and Cheng et al (2014), who considered taxiway conflict in their study, while ignoring the possibility of head‐on and rear‐end collisions at the taxiway. A three step heuristic sequential approach was proposed by Guépet et al (2017), where the earliest runway arrival time for departure flights and the earliest gate arrival time for arrival flights were estimated first and used to sequence take offs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%