2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.04.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AJCC 8th Edition oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma staging – Is it an improvement on the AJCC 7th Edition?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
61
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
61
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We demonstrated that DOI led to upstaging in 16.6% of patients, whereas pENE led to upstaging in 13.3% of patients; the overall stage was changed in 24.8% of patients. Furthermore, we demonstrated less stage migration from AJCC 7 pT2 to AJCC 8 pT3 in our cohort (16.4%) than Ebrahimi et al (46.8%) and Pollaers et al (50%) in their international and Australian cohorts, and this suggests that, if anything, our study may be underestimating the impact of stage migration.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…We demonstrated that DOI led to upstaging in 16.6% of patients, whereas pENE led to upstaging in 13.3% of patients; the overall stage was changed in 24.8% of patients. Furthermore, we demonstrated less stage migration from AJCC 7 pT2 to AJCC 8 pT3 in our cohort (16.4%) than Ebrahimi et al (46.8%) and Pollaers et al (50%) in their international and Australian cohorts, and this suggests that, if anything, our study may be underestimating the impact of stage migration.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…Traditional tumor staging (AJCC/UICC‐TNM classification) regime is routinely employed to predict clinical outcomes of patients with OSCC after radical resection (Chinn & Myers, ). However, significant differences in prognosis are usually observed in patients with same TNM stages, thus indicating that TNM staging remains far from optimal in prognostic assessment in the clinic (Okuyemi, Piccirillo, & Spitznagel, ; Pollaers, Hinton‐Bayre, Friedland, & Farah, ). Current TNM regime based on tumor size, the presence of cervical lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis is not sufficient to accurately predict the prognosis of OSCC (Chinn & Myers, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Globally over the last twenty years, there has been increasing incidence of oral cancer throughout the developed world including Australia, New Zealand, North America, Europe and parts of East Asia . The reported five‐year survival rate of stage III or IV oral cancer ranges between 15% and 55% . Although survival rates have improved in the last 3 decades in developed countries, these remain low in developing countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although survival rates have improved in the last 3 decades in developed countries, these remain low in developing countries. In Australia, the 5‐year overall survival rate ranges from 25% to 84.6%, while the 5‐year disease‐free survival rate ranges from 25% to 73.7% depending on disease stage . The most important prognostic marker for oral cancer is still tumour stage at diagnosis .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%