2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2018.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AK-MCSi: A Kriging-based method to deal with small failure probabilities and time-consuming models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e second example is a multidimensional performance function, which is a classic illustration in [13,25]. e explicit expression of the performance function is given as…”
Section: Case 2 (Multidimensional Performance Function)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…e second example is a multidimensional performance function, which is a classic illustration in [13,25]. e explicit expression of the performance function is given as…”
Section: Case 2 (Multidimensional Performance Function)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When |y| ≤ Δy, g(x) ≤ 0, and then the gear is in the failure state. It is known from Section 5.1 that y(t) is an implicit response and needs to be obtained by solving equation (25) with the fourth-order Runge-Kutta numerical integration method, so the performance function g(x) is also an implicit response as well, and each calculation of the gear performance function requires about 7.260 seconds (i3 cpu). Furthermore, the response of the gear performance function is highly nonlinear.…”
Section: Limit State Function Of Gear Vibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several algorithms have been proposed to deal with very small failure probabilities (10 −5 −10 −9 ) and multiple failure regions: Meta‐IS, MetaAK‐IS 2 , BSS, ASVR, 2 SMART, AK‐MCSi, GPSS, AK‐MCS‐IS, S4IS, and SS‐KK . Some other methods such as SORM or AK‐IS are suitable for very small failure probabilities, but rely on the existence of an assumed unique so‐called most probable failure point.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al [21]. Other methods have also been presented to address specific problems such as small failure probabilities (rare events) estimations [3,22,23,24,25,7,26] , multiple failure regions problems [27,28,29,30] or systems failure probabilities assessment [6,31,5,2,9,32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%