2021
DOI: 10.22392/actaquatr.800582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aksaray İli (Türkiye) İhtiyofaunası

Abstract: As a result of the field studies carried out between

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the Names of Fishes Committee's acceptance of Sander , that name has been used in almost every academic and popular publication, American and European, ever since, including ichthyology textbooks (e.g., Helfman et al 2009 ), phylogenetic studies (Smith and Mendelson 2011 ), distributional studies (Ribeiro et al 2009 ), conservation "red lists" (Freyhof and Kottelat 2008 ;Baer et al 2014 ), museum checklists (Więcaszek and Piasecki 2020 ), ichthyofaunal surveys (Hanel and Andreska 2015 ;Kelleci et al 2021 ), aquaculture studies (Javid Rahmdel and Falahatkar 2021 ), and books on the fi shes of Europe (Kottelat and Freyhof 2007 ), Germany (Fricke 2014 ;Thiel and Thiel 2015 ), France (Keith et al 2011 ), Britain (Everard 2020 ), North America Burr 2011 ), British Columbia (McPhail 2007 ), Ontario (Holm and Mandrak 2010 ), Manitoba (Stewart and Watkinson 2004 ), Arctic Canada (Coad and Reist 2018 ), Vermont (Langdon and Ferguson 2006 ), Pennsylvania (Stauffer and Criswell 2016 ), Ohio (Rice and Zimmerman 2019 ), Indiana (Simon 2011 ), Minnesota (Dickson 2008 ), Kansas (Kansas Fishes Committee 2014 ), Nebraska (Hrabik et al 2015 ), Alabama (Boschung and Mayden 2004 ), South Carolina (Rohde et al 2009), Florida (Robins et al 2018, Idaho (Sigler and Zaroban 2018 ), the Rockies (Sullivan and Propst 2009 ), and the American Southwest (Minckley and Marsh 2009 ). Indeed, few works have chosen to use Stizostedion since 2003.…”
Section: Electrically Propelled Electrofishing Vesselsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the Names of Fishes Committee's acceptance of Sander , that name has been used in almost every academic and popular publication, American and European, ever since, including ichthyology textbooks (e.g., Helfman et al 2009 ), phylogenetic studies (Smith and Mendelson 2011 ), distributional studies (Ribeiro et al 2009 ), conservation "red lists" (Freyhof and Kottelat 2008 ;Baer et al 2014 ), museum checklists (Więcaszek and Piasecki 2020 ), ichthyofaunal surveys (Hanel and Andreska 2015 ;Kelleci et al 2021 ), aquaculture studies (Javid Rahmdel and Falahatkar 2021 ), and books on the fi shes of Europe (Kottelat and Freyhof 2007 ), Germany (Fricke 2014 ;Thiel and Thiel 2015 ), France (Keith et al 2011 ), Britain (Everard 2020 ), North America Burr 2011 ), British Columbia (McPhail 2007 ), Ontario (Holm and Mandrak 2010 ), Manitoba (Stewart and Watkinson 2004 ), Arctic Canada (Coad and Reist 2018 ), Vermont (Langdon and Ferguson 2006 ), Pennsylvania (Stauffer and Criswell 2016 ), Ohio (Rice and Zimmerman 2019 ), Indiana (Simon 2011 ), Minnesota (Dickson 2008 ), Kansas (Kansas Fishes Committee 2014 ), Nebraska (Hrabik et al 2015 ), Alabama (Boschung and Mayden 2004 ), South Carolina (Rohde et al 2009), Florida (Robins et al 2018, Idaho (Sigler and Zaroban 2018 ), the Rockies (Sullivan and Propst 2009 ), and the American Southwest (Minckley and Marsh 2009 ). Indeed, few works have chosen to use Stizostedion since 2003.…”
Section: Electrically Propelled Electrofishing Vesselsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One could argue that Nelson et al (2003) should not have recommended that Sander , a long‐forgotten name, replace Stizostedion , which had been in use for 183 years. They wrote:
Although the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature could have been petitioned to conserve Stizostedion , other references to Sander in the European literature (Bogutskaya et al 2001) suggest to us that it is now too late to petition and we thus employ the generic name Sander .
Since the Names of Fishes Committee’s acceptance of Sander , that name has been used in almost every academic and popular publication, American and European, ever since, including ichthyology textbooks (e.g., Helfman et al 2009), phylogenetic studies (Smith and Mendelson 2011), distributional studies (Ribeiro et al 2009), conservation “red lists” (Freyhof and Kottelat 2008; Baer et al 2014), museum checklists (Więcaszek and Piasecki 2020), ichthyofaunal surveys (Hanel and Andreska 2015; Kelleci et al 2021), aquaculture studies (Javid Rahmdel and Falahatkar 2021), and books on the fishes of Europe (Kottelat and Freyhof 2007), Germany (Fricke 2014; Thiel and Thiel 2015), France (Keith et al 2011), Britain (Everard 2020), North America (Page and Burr 2011), British Columbia (McPhail 2007), Ontario (Holm and Mandrak 2010), Manitoba (Stewart and Watkinson 2004), Arctic Canada (Coad and Reist 2018), Vermont (Langdon and Ferguson 2006), Pennsylvania (Stauffer and Criswell 2016), Ohio (Rice and Zimmerman 2019), Indiana (Simon 2011), Minnesota (Dickson 2008), Kansas (Kansas Fishes Committee 2014), Nebraska (Hrabik et al 2015), Alabama (Boschung and Mayden 2004), South Carolina (Rohde et al 2009), Florida (Robins et al 2018), Idaho (Sigler and Zaroban 2018), the Rockies (Sullivan and Propst 2009), and the American Southwest (Minckley and Marsh 2009). Indeed, few works have chosen to use Stizostedion since 2003.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%