“…Since the Names of Fishes Committee's acceptance of Sander , that name has been used in almost every academic and popular publication, American and European, ever since, including ichthyology textbooks (e.g., Helfman et al 2009 ), phylogenetic studies (Smith and Mendelson 2011 ), distributional studies (Ribeiro et al 2009 ), conservation "red lists" (Freyhof and Kottelat 2008 ;Baer et al 2014 ), museum checklists (Więcaszek and Piasecki 2020 ), ichthyofaunal surveys (Hanel and Andreska 2015 ;Kelleci et al 2021 ), aquaculture studies (Javid Rahmdel and Falahatkar 2021 ), and books on the fi shes of Europe (Kottelat and Freyhof 2007 ), Germany (Fricke 2014 ;Thiel and Thiel 2015 ), France (Keith et al 2011 ), Britain (Everard 2020 ), North America Burr 2011 ), British Columbia (McPhail 2007 ), Ontario (Holm and Mandrak 2010 ), Manitoba (Stewart and Watkinson 2004 ), Arctic Canada (Coad and Reist 2018 ), Vermont (Langdon and Ferguson 2006 ), Pennsylvania (Stauffer and Criswell 2016 ), Ohio (Rice and Zimmerman 2019 ), Indiana (Simon 2011 ), Minnesota (Dickson 2008 ), Kansas (Kansas Fishes Committee 2014 ), Nebraska (Hrabik et al 2015 ), Alabama (Boschung and Mayden 2004 ), South Carolina (Rohde et al 2009), Florida (Robins et al 2018, Idaho (Sigler and Zaroban 2018 ), the Rockies (Sullivan and Propst 2009 ), and the American Southwest (Minckley and Marsh 2009 ). Indeed, few works have chosen to use Stizostedion since 2003.…”
Women of Fisheries is a nonprofi t organization that provides a forum where women in fi sheries science can connect, share stories, ask questions, learn from each other, and work together to tackle some of the issues facing women in our fi eld. Women of Fisheries represents over 1,000 women within the fi sheries and aquatic sciences fi eld across the globe. The articles on this page previously were published on the Women of Fisheries blog.To support the Women of Fishers with a tax-deductible contribution, please visit womenoffi sheries.org.
“…Since the Names of Fishes Committee's acceptance of Sander , that name has been used in almost every academic and popular publication, American and European, ever since, including ichthyology textbooks (e.g., Helfman et al 2009 ), phylogenetic studies (Smith and Mendelson 2011 ), distributional studies (Ribeiro et al 2009 ), conservation "red lists" (Freyhof and Kottelat 2008 ;Baer et al 2014 ), museum checklists (Więcaszek and Piasecki 2020 ), ichthyofaunal surveys (Hanel and Andreska 2015 ;Kelleci et al 2021 ), aquaculture studies (Javid Rahmdel and Falahatkar 2021 ), and books on the fi shes of Europe (Kottelat and Freyhof 2007 ), Germany (Fricke 2014 ;Thiel and Thiel 2015 ), France (Keith et al 2011 ), Britain (Everard 2020 ), North America Burr 2011 ), British Columbia (McPhail 2007 ), Ontario (Holm and Mandrak 2010 ), Manitoba (Stewart and Watkinson 2004 ), Arctic Canada (Coad and Reist 2018 ), Vermont (Langdon and Ferguson 2006 ), Pennsylvania (Stauffer and Criswell 2016 ), Ohio (Rice and Zimmerman 2019 ), Indiana (Simon 2011 ), Minnesota (Dickson 2008 ), Kansas (Kansas Fishes Committee 2014 ), Nebraska (Hrabik et al 2015 ), Alabama (Boschung and Mayden 2004 ), South Carolina (Rohde et al 2009), Florida (Robins et al 2018, Idaho (Sigler and Zaroban 2018 ), the Rockies (Sullivan and Propst 2009 ), and the American Southwest (Minckley and Marsh 2009 ). Indeed, few works have chosen to use Stizostedion since 2003.…”
Women of Fisheries is a nonprofi t organization that provides a forum where women in fi sheries science can connect, share stories, ask questions, learn from each other, and work together to tackle some of the issues facing women in our fi eld. Women of Fisheries represents over 1,000 women within the fi sheries and aquatic sciences fi eld across the globe. The articles on this page previously were published on the Women of Fisheries blog.To support the Women of Fishers with a tax-deductible contribution, please visit womenoffi sheries.org.
“…One could argue that Nelson et al (2003) should not have recommended that Sander , a long‐forgotten name, replace Stizostedion , which had been in use for 183 years. They wrote: Since the Names of Fishes Committee’s acceptance of Sander , that name has been used in almost every academic and popular publication, American and European, ever since, including ichthyology textbooks (e.g., Helfman et al 2009), phylogenetic studies (Smith and Mendelson 2011), distributional studies (Ribeiro et al 2009), conservation “red lists” (Freyhof and Kottelat 2008; Baer et al 2014), museum checklists (Więcaszek and Piasecki 2020), ichthyofaunal surveys (Hanel and Andreska 2015; Kelleci et al 2021), aquaculture studies (Javid Rahmdel and Falahatkar 2021), and books on the fishes of Europe (Kottelat and Freyhof 2007), Germany (Fricke 2014; Thiel and Thiel 2015), France (Keith et al 2011), Britain (Everard 2020), North America (Page and Burr 2011), British Columbia (McPhail 2007), Ontario (Holm and Mandrak 2010), Manitoba (Stewart and Watkinson 2004), Arctic Canada (Coad and Reist 2018), Vermont (Langdon and Ferguson 2006), Pennsylvania (Stauffer and Criswell 2016), Ohio (Rice and Zimmerman 2019), Indiana (Simon 2011), Minnesota (Dickson 2008), Kansas (Kansas Fishes Committee 2014), Nebraska (Hrabik et al 2015), Alabama (Boschung and Mayden 2004), South Carolina (Rohde et al 2009), Florida (Robins et al 2018), Idaho (Sigler and Zaroban 2018), the Rockies (Sullivan and Propst 2009), and the American Southwest (Minckley and Marsh 2009). Indeed, few works have chosen to use Stizostedion since 2003.…”
Climate change is affecting freshwater ecosystems globally, particularly those in semi-arid and arid regions. The Central Anatolian Ecoregion (CAE) in Türkiye has a semi-arid climate and is home to numerous endemic fish species. We used species distribution modelling to elucidate the distribution of sixteen endemic fish species in CAE and predicted their potential distributions for 2041–2060 and 2081–2100 based on the CMIP6 climate model. Half of the species are predicted to experience a significant loss of climatically suitable areas. Anatolichthys fontinalis, Gobio gymnostethus, Gobio hettitorum, and Pseudophoxinus burduricus will face a complete loss of suitable areas by 2081–2100 under a high emissions climate scenario, whereas Cobitis bilseli, Egirdira nigra, Gobio intermedius, and Squalius anatolicus will experience a significant loss. The other eight species can potentially benefit from climate warming if all other stressors remain equal. Anthropogenic stressors, such as water abstraction for irrigation, pollution, invasive species introductions, and dam construction, are already putting endemic fish populations in CAE under extreme pressure. Climate change is expected to exacerbate these threats. Regular monitoring of freshwater ecosystems and fish fauna in the CAE and protecting the region from key anthropogenic stressors are recommended to successfully conserve these endemic freshwater fishes under climate change.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.