Aksjonsforskning i Norge: Teoretisk og empirisk mangfold

Gjøtterud, Sigrid; Hiim, Hilde; Husebø, Dag; Jensen, Liv Helene; Steen-Olsen, Tove Herborg; Stjernstrøm, Else

doi:10.23865/noasp.17

Cited by 11 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 118 publications

(210 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The research-based knowledge for this study has been generated using a follow-up collaborative approach by which practitioners and researchers engaged in close and continuous dialogue and co-reflection throughout the research process. The research design was inspired by developmental evaluation (Patton, 2010;Patton, McKegg and Wehipeihana, 2015), trailing research (Finne, Levin and Nilssen, 1995) and action research approaches (Eikeland, 2011;Gjøtterud et al, 2017), and provided the basis for ongoing learning and feedback. The project participants from the various businesses and public agencies were recognised throughout as equal co-producers of knowledge, in line with the principles of "engaged scholarship" ( Van de Ven, 2007).…”

Section: Data Generationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Entrepreneurial Intermediation in Innovation: A Study of Multilayered Contexts and Embedded Dynamics of Organisation-Creation

Sletterød¹,

Carlsson²,

Hjorth³

2021

JEOD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article is based on a theoretical exploration and empirical analysis of formalized public initiated instruments-eight network entrepreneurs-intended to promote, intermediate and support innovation and entrepreneurship in firms and firm networks located in three different business areas in Mid-Norway: food value chain, experience industries, and renewable energy and environmental technology. The article intends to explore how the intermediation perspectives in innovation theory could be combined with the entrepreneuring perspective in entrepreneurship theory, to build an alternative analytic approach to understand and explain contextually and dynamically embedded organisation-creation, better than the innovation-intermediation and the entrepreneuring perspectives separately are capable of. By inventing a tertius typology representing six archetypes of organizationcreative action and strategies inherent in all innovative and entrepreneurial firm development, intermediation and entrepreneuring are seen as interwoven processes constantly emerging, evolving and interacting in multilayered contexts and dynamics of organisation-creation. Embeddedness or contextuality factors of all kinds are at work in every process of becoming and in spacing of newness, the primary goal for entrepreneurship and innovation suis generis. Accordingly, the article explores the traditional conceptions of change, entrepreneurship and innovation by contrasting them with process and event philosophical perspectives of firm development.

show abstract

Section: Data Generationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Entrepreneurial Intermediation in Innovation: A Study of Multilayered Contexts and Embedded Dynamics of Organisation-Creation

Sletterød¹,

Carlsson²,

Hjorth³

2021

JEOD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Mens andre former for forskning i egen praksis snakker om «jeg» eller «I» i forskningen, brukes «selv» som begrep i selv-studier. Feldman, Paugh og Mills (2004) skriver at «what distinguishes self-study as a form of practitioner research is its focus on the self» (s. 949). Forfatterne knytter selv-studet til eksistensialisme og fremholder at en nøkkel til å forstå den eksistensielle tilnaermingen er ideen om at undervisning «is a way of being» (s. 972).…”

Section: Selv-studier I Praksisunclassified

Aksjonsforskning – ansats til en historisk systematikk

Eikeland¹

2020

Aksjonsforskning I Norge, Volum 2: Grunnlagstenkning, Forskerroller Og Bidrag Til Endring I Ulike Kontekster

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The following text attempts, without pretending completeness, to analyze approaches to action research based on where and how they position themselves socially, on how they work, and on their actual basic distinctions. The result is a tentative typology presented roughly historically, which cuts through the many labels typical of current action research. Different approaches are useful, each for different purposes. Still, most circle consciously or subconsciously around some form of “practice” which works as a standard of measurement or quality criterion. The conclusion is that there is a certain sine qua non in the field of action research, i.e. a form “toward which, ways of doing things tend to evolve from a wide variety of starting points”.

show abstract

“…Trist and Bamforth (1951) brought the experiences with responsible autonomy to IDE and Norway. Today, we find this thinking in important concepts like Employee-driven innovation (Høyrup, 2010;Alasoini, 2011;Amelsvoort & Hootegem, 2017) and interdisciplinary cooperative work research as, for example, action research (Gustavsen, 2014;Levin, 2017).…”

Section: The Aftermath Of Ide: From Principles Of Organization To Primentioning

confidence: 99%

The Organization Theories of the Industrial Democracy Experiments Meet Contemporary Organizational Realities

Klemsdal

Ravn

Amble

et al. 2017

NJWLS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Scandinavian industrial democracy experiments (IDEs) contained elements of organization theories, based particularly on sociotechnical systems theory (STS). In this paper, we provide an introduction to some main points of these theories and their aftermath, as a context for the six papers of the special issue on the relevance of the organization theories of the IDE for contemporary organizational realities. The six papers are also summarized and positioned in relation to the theoretical insights from the IDE. KEy woRds Scandinavian industrial democracy experiments / sociotechnical systems theory / responsible autonomy / joint optimization

show abstract

Aksjonsforskning i Norge: Teoretisk og empirisk mangfold

Cited by 11 publications

References 118 publications

Entrepreneurial Intermediation in Innovation: A Study of Multilayered Contexts and Embedded Dynamics of Organisation-Creation

Entrepreneurial Intermediation in Innovation: A Study of Multilayered Contexts and Embedded Dynamics of Organisation-Creation

Aksjonsforskning – ansats til en historisk systematikk

The Organization Theories of the Industrial Democracy Experiments Meet Contemporary Organizational Realities

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About