Akutmaßes zur Erfassung von Erholung und Beanspruchung

Hitzschke, Brit; Holst, Theresa; Ferrauti, Alexander; Meyer, Tim; Pfeiffer, Mark; Kellmann, Michael

doi:10.1037/t60480-000

Cited by 2 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For this reason, the development of the Acute Recovery and Stress Scale (ARSS; Hitzschke et al, 2016;Kellmann, Kölling, & Hitzschke, 2016), and the Short Recovery and Stress Scale (SRSS; Hitzschke et al, 2015; was initiated in Germany.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development of two short measures for recovery and stress in sport

Nässi

Ferrauti

Meyer

et al. 2017

European Journal of Sport Science

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Acute Recovery and Stress Scale (ARSS) and the Short Recovery and Stress Scale were first established in German for the purposes of monitoring athletes' current recovery-stress states in an economical and multidimensional manner. The aim of this paper is to document the development and initial validation of the English versions of these two psychometric monitoring tools. A total of 267 English-speaking athletes from a variety of team and individual sports participated in the study. The English versions demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency for both instruments (Cronbach α of .74-.89). Furthermore, good model fit was found for the eight scales of the ARSS, matching the structure and results of the German counterparts. Correlations among and between the scales reciprocate the theoretical constructs of stress and recovery, supporting the construct validity of the scales. Correlation coefficients within stress and recovery ranged between r = .29 and .68. The correlations between stress and recovery varied between r = -.29 and -.64. These constructs were further supported by correlations with the scores of the Recovery-Stress Questionnaire for Athletes, thereby showing convergent validity. The findings demonstrate initial validity and reliability of the two measures and reflect the results of the German versions. However, further research is needed before applying these scales in practical settings.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development of two short measures for recovery and stress in sport

Nässi

Ferrauti

Meyer

et al. 2017

European Journal of Sport Science

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Instead of listing the adjectives separately, the athlete is asked to rate each scale as a whole, with the equivalent adjectives listed as examples. Regarding the psychometric properties, all scales of the German ARSS showed satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach alpha between α = .84 and α = .96) and a confirmatory factor analysis portrayed good model fit for both recovery (RMSEA = .07, CFI = .97, SRMR = .04) and stress (RMSEA = .09, CFI = .94, SRMR = .05) factors (Hitzschke et al, 2016). The SRSS supported a content matching Spearman correlation pattern to the ARSS (range σ = .40 to σ = .71, p < .001), and showed satisfactory internal consistencies for all scales of at least a Cronbach's alpha of α = .75 (Hitzschke et al, 2015).…”

Section: Acute Recovery and Stress Scale And Short Recovery And Stres...mentioning

confidence: 93%

“…Regarding the psychometric properties, all scales of the German ARSS showed satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach alpha between α = .84 and α = .96) and a confirmatory factor analysis portrayed good model fit for both recovery (RMSEA = .07, CFI = .97, SRMR = .04) and stress (RMSEA = .09, CFI = .94, SRMR = .05) factors (Hitzschke et al, 2016). The SRSS supported a content matching Spearman correlation pattern to the ARSS (range σ = .40 to σ = .71, p < .001), and showed satisfactory internal consistencies for all scales of at least a Cronbach's alpha of α = .75 (Hitzschke et al, 2015). The English translations of the ARSS and SRSS are still in the development phase, and initial results are promising (Nässi, Ferrauti, Meyer, Pfeiffer, & Kellmann, 2017).…”

Section: Acute Recovery and Stress Scale And Short Recovery And Stres...mentioning

confidence: 93%

“…While the EmRecQ is listed as a monitoring tool in the literature (Cotterill, 2012;Hitzschke et al, 2016;Saw, Kellmann, Main, & Gastin, 2017), it was rather surprising that not many studies have implemented this tool. Due to the limited applicability of a single case study and the questionnaire development publication, more research is recommended to delineate the sensitivity of the EmRecQ to alterations in training practices.…”

Section: Emotional Recovery Questionnairementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The ARSS (Hitzschke et al, 2016;, and the SRSS (Hitzschke et al, 2015; assess an athlete's recovery-stress state by focusing on both stress and recovery. They were developed to fulfil the need of an economic and valid psychometric measure that can quantify a current recovery-stress state.…”

Section: Acute Recovery and Stress Scale And Short Recovery And Stres...mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations