1986
DOI: 10.3327/jnst.23.949
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Albedo analytical method for multi-scattered neutron flux calculation in cavity.

Abstract: A simple formula which describes multi-scattered neutron flux in a spherical cavity was derived based on the albedo concept. The formura treats a neutron source which has an arbitrary energy-angle distribution and is placed a t any point in the cavity. T h e derived formula was applied to the estimation of neutron fluxes in two cavities, i.e. a spherical concrete cell with a 14-MeV neutron source a t the center and the "YAYOI" reactor cavity with a pencil beam of reactor neutrons. The results of the analytical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As reviewed in detail by Shin et al, 4 neutron albedos are generally well fitted with a cosine function of the reflecting polar angle. Shin et al 4 further stated that a necessary condition for uniform neutron fluence rate distribution is cosinelike dependence.…”
Section: Letter To the Editormentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As reviewed in detail by Shin et al, 4 neutron albedos are generally well fitted with a cosine function of the reflecting polar angle. Shin et al 4 further stated that a necessary condition for uniform neutron fluence rate distribution is cosinelike dependence.…”
Section: Letter To the Editormentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Shin et al 4 further stated that a necessary condition for uniform neutron fluence rate distribution is cosinelike dependence. In a complementary vein Leimdorfer 5 stated that the wall scattered gamma energy fluence rate in a room of any shape surrounded by cosine-emitting walls can be proved to be constant and isotropic.…”
Section: Letter To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(3) as expressed above, we give imaginary source intensity 81 at point P1 as, 81 = 1l"T~<p1 = (¼r c: r (;; r s, (4) and radiation flux </ >2 at point P2 as, = 4:l5 (if c~ r (: r (5) By analogy to the above, radiation flux </>n at the exit point of the n-th leg can be obtained as,…”
Section: Simplified Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] But the desired degree of simplification cannot always be achieved in most of them, since enormous preparatory calculations are necessary to estimate the radiation shielding properties for using the formulae.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%