2020
DOI: 10.3390/jcm9030778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alcohol Hangover Differentially Modulates the Processing of Relevant and Irrelevant Information

Abstract: Elevated distractibility is one of the major contributors to alcohol hangover-induced behavioral deficits. Yet, the basic mechanisms driving increased distractibility during hangovers are still not very well understood. Aside from impairments in attention and psychomotor functions, changes in stimulus-response bindings may also increase responding to distracting information, as suggested by the theory of event coding (TEC). Yet, this has never been investigated in the context of alcohol hangover. Therefore, we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(114 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, AH may be acting on attentional allocation processes, which consequently interferes with memory recognition. This is largely consistent with previous research that found faster processing of visual information during AH (Stock et al 2017 ), as well as an increase in the processing of task-irrelevant information during AH compared with control conditions (Opitz et al 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Instead, AH may be acting on attentional allocation processes, which consequently interferes with memory recognition. This is largely consistent with previous research that found faster processing of visual information during AH (Stock et al 2017 ), as well as an increase in the processing of task-irrelevant information during AH compared with control conditions (Opitz et al 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…There were no previous studies investigating the size of hangover effects in Markov decision tasks, but studies on other cognitive control domains reported effect sizes between f = 0.32 and f = 0.6 for their reported hangover effects in comparable within-subject study designs [11,17,35]. Based on this, we estimated the required sample size for two repeated measures sessions (sober vs. hungover) and five relevant measures (MF-score, MB-score, final score, ω, π) at an alpha error probability of 5% and a power of 95% for an estimated medium effect size of f = 0.30 (assuming a default inter-correlation of 0.5).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three articles from Stock and colleagues investigated this in more detail. In article 19, they demonstrate that the alcohol hangover differentially modulates the processing of relevant and irrelevant information [ 37 ], and article 20 discusses findings showing that the alcohol hangover slightly impairs response selection but not response inhibition [ 38 ]. Finally, article 21 shows that the alcohol hangover does not alter the application of model-based and model-free learning strategies [ 39 ].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%