2019
DOI: 10.3390/jcm8091317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alcohol Hangover Slightly Impairs Response Selection but not Response Inhibition

Abstract: Alcohol hangover commonly occurs after an episode of heavy drinking. It has previously been demonstrated that acute high-dose alcohol intoxication reduces cognitive control, while automatic processes remain comparatively unaffected. However, it has remained unclear whether alcohol hangover, as a consequence of binge drinking, modulates the interplay between cognitive control and automaticity in a comparable way. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of alcohol hangover on controll… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eventually, n = 35 participants (23.1 ± 2.7 years old) were included in the statistical analyses because one participant was excluded due to performance accuracy close to chance level (i.e., below 55%) in at least one experimental task condition and another participant was excluded because of his high residual breath alcohol concentration (BrAC = 0.45% ) at the hangover session, which would have taken a waiting time of 4 to 5 additional hours until sobriety and he was not able to invest the required time on that day. Please also note that the sample in this publication largely overlapped with that of a previous publication investigating the influence of alcohol hangover on meta-control/the interplay between controlled and automated processes [19].…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Eventually, n = 35 participants (23.1 ± 2.7 years old) were included in the statistical analyses because one participant was excluded due to performance accuracy close to chance level (i.e., below 55%) in at least one experimental task condition and another participant was excluded because of his high residual breath alcohol concentration (BrAC = 0.45% ) at the hangover session, which would have taken a waiting time of 4 to 5 additional hours until sobriety and he was not able to invest the required time on that day. Please also note that the sample in this publication largely overlapped with that of a previous publication investigating the influence of alcohol hangover on meta-control/the interplay between controlled and automated processes [19].…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The experimental design was identical to that described in previous publications by our group [18,19], and is illustrated in Figure 2.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations