2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alcohol-related attentional biases in recently detoxified inpatients with severe alcohol use disorder: an eye-tracking approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
7
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
7
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As this latter measure is known to reflect the processes related to controlled maintenance of attention, AB would thus appear at the later and more controlled stages of attentional processing in subclinical drinkers rather than being characterized by an early and involuntary hijacking of attention provoked by alcohol-related stimuli as postulated by dominant models in addiction (Bechara, 2005; Wiers et al, 2007). However, this could also be due to the higher reliability of dwell time measure reported in the present study and in previous ones (Bollen et al, 2020, 2021; Christiansen et al, 2015b). Future studies on AB should systematically go beyond behavioural measures, centrally by using eye-tracking methods, but also develop novel paradigms to more reliably determine the automatic nature of AB.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…As this latter measure is known to reflect the processes related to controlled maintenance of attention, AB would thus appear at the later and more controlled stages of attentional processing in subclinical drinkers rather than being characterized by an early and involuntary hijacking of attention provoked by alcohol-related stimuli as postulated by dominant models in addiction (Bechara, 2005; Wiers et al, 2007). However, this could also be due to the higher reliability of dwell time measure reported in the present study and in previous ones (Bollen et al, 2020, 2021; Christiansen et al, 2015b). Future studies on AB should systematically go beyond behavioural measures, centrally by using eye-tracking methods, but also develop novel paradigms to more reliably determine the automatic nature of AB.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…This casts doubt upon the postulated automatic/early nature of AB in SAUD [17], already questioned by heterogeneous findings when manipulating stimuli duration in behavioural experiments [45,46]. In contrast, our results regarding the late component are in line with eye-tracking studies in subclinical [47] and clinical [16] populations, as well as with earlier studies targeting such malleable late components in attentional retraining [6,24]. We thus highlighted the relevance of dwell time measures to investigate the preferential maintenance of attention throughout the trial, and we encourage future studies to increase the reliability of early eye-tracking indices by presenting stimuli vertically to override the predominant left-gaze bias and/or by developing AB tasks specifically exploring the early attentional capture by alcohol-related cues [48].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Finally, we suggest that AB, regardless of its direction (approach/avoidance), is significantly underpinned by late attentional stages (assessed through dwell time measures) and is mainly characterized by a preferential maintenance of attention towards alcohol/non‐alcohol stimuli. In contrast, the facilitated capture of attention could not be reliably assessed in the present study (similarly to previous ones [16, 33, 44]), as the measure of first AOI visited was contaminated by the classical dominance of the left side of the visual field related to reading/writing habits [43]. Nevertheless, we observed that the presumably strong attention‐grabbing properties of alcohol‐related stimuli (as postulated by dominant models [4]) did not overcome the left‐gaze bias, even in participants showing stronger AB towards alcohol at later processing stages (i.e.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 47%
See 2 more Smart Citations