2018
DOI: 10.1136/jech-2017-210078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) and mortality risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: AUDIT screening scores were associated with mortality risk. The association was differential depending on the population examined, which may be related to prevalence of former drinkers among current abstainers. Due to heterogeneity between studies and the small number of populations examined, generalisability may be limited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This relationship was also confirmed in the meta-analysis of studies using a different tool for harmful drinking assessment i.e. : Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…This relationship was also confirmed in the meta-analysis of studies using a different tool for harmful drinking assessment i.e. : Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Findings of a possible harmful use of alcohol in general were quite high, and the AUDIT‐C cut‐off ≥5, which we used for both males and females was found optimal in a study of admitted trauma patients 39 . Even with a cut‐off ≥4 a meta‐analysis revealed increased long‐term mortality 56,57 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…39 Even with a cut-off ≥4 a metaanalysis revealed increased long-term mortality. 56,57 Sub-group analyses of patients admitted with a GCS < 15 or discharged with a diagnosis of head injury or the more serious TBI,…”
Section: F I G U R Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data on the results of the self-assessment version of the audit score in table 3 shows that 54.5% of study subjects who have a habit of drinking alcohol are in zone II that need educational/counseling interventions to simple suggestions to individuals for their behavior or drinking habits, which means intensive time is needed for the habit of drinking alcohol turned out to be less (Babor, et. al., 2001;Kuitunen-Paul & Roerecke, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%