1994
DOI: 10.1037/0893-164x.8.2.111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alcoholic subjects' attentional bias in the processing of alcohol-related words.

Abstract: Attentional bias for alcohol-related words was studied irM8 alcoholic and 18 matched control subjects with a modified version of the Stroop Color and Word Test (1935) that included color-interfering, alcohol-related, and neutral words. Results indicate that (a) alcoholic subjects responded more slowly to all word categories than control subjects (p < .009), (b) both alcoholic and control subjects responded more slowly to colorinterfering words than to neutral words (p < .01), and (c) only alcoholic subjects r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

9
84
1
5

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
9
84
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In this framework where alcohol has acquired strong motivational properties, alcohol-related stimuli may be seen as 'hijacking' the attention of heavy drinkers and alcoholics (e.g., Johnsen et al 1994;Townshend and Duka 2001;Waters and Green 2003;Noël et al 2005Noël et al , 2006Jones et al 2003). For instance, when performing the alcohol Stroop task, sober alcoholics are slower than non-alcoholic controls in naming the color of alcohol-related words (e.g., Johnsen et al 1994;Stetter et al 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this framework where alcohol has acquired strong motivational properties, alcohol-related stimuli may be seen as 'hijacking' the attention of heavy drinkers and alcoholics (e.g., Johnsen et al 1994;Townshend and Duka 2001;Waters and Green 2003;Noël et al 2005Noël et al , 2006Jones et al 2003). For instance, when performing the alcohol Stroop task, sober alcoholics are slower than non-alcoholic controls in naming the color of alcohol-related words (e.g., Johnsen et al 1994;Stetter et al 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, when performing the alcohol Stroop task, sober alcoholics are slower than non-alcoholic controls in naming the color of alcohol-related words (e.g., Johnsen et al 1994;Stetter et al 1995). When performing a selective attentional task (the dot-probe detection task), regular social drinkers show a clear attentional orienting response toward alcohol-related stimuli over neutral stimuli, whereas occasional alcohol drinkers do not (Townshend and Duka 2001;Field et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tal punto de corte, si bien se puede variar en función de la finalidad que se le dé al mismo, puede resultar una herramienta de gran utilidad tanto en la práctica clínica como con fines de investigación. En este sentido, criterios similares, utilizados en la versión inglesa del instrumento, se han mostrado fiables a la hora de identificar no sólo a pacientes con abuso patológico de alcohol y/o dependencia alcohólica (p.e., Cox et al, 2003;Johnsen et al, 1994), sino también a pacientes dependientes con mayor probabilidad de recaída (Cox et al, 2002). De este modo, futuros estudios deberán contrastar la fiabilidad del instrumento desarrollado y analizar la eficacia de los criterios determinados en nuestro estudio a la hora de identificar pacientes con problemas de alcoholismo.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…De este modo, las personas con problemas de consumo patológico y dependencia alcohólica tardarán más en nombrar el color de palabras relacionadas con el alcohol ya que sus recursos atencionales se quedarían "enganchados" en el procesamiento de dichos estímulos. Consistentemente, diversos estudios empleando esta prueba han mostrado que el índice de procesamiento atencional proporcionado por el test de Stroop de alcohol permite diferenciar a personas con abuso de alcohol de aquéllas que no abusan (Cox et al, 2003); así como a personas que han desarrollado una dependencia alcohólica de aquéllas que no (Johnsen, Laberg, Cox, Vaksdal & Hugdahl, 1994), e incluso a personas dependientes con más probabilidades de recaer en el consumo durante el tratamiento de la dependencia (Cox, Hogan, Kristian & Race, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…AAB was first demonstrated with the Stroop paradigm (Johnsen, Laberg, Cox, Vaksdal, & Hugdahl, 1994), where the primary task is to quickly name the color of the print of words visually presented while ignoring the semantic context of each word. When the semantic content is alcohol-related (e.g., beer) the color-naming latency of heavier drinkers, problem drinkers, or alcoholics is found to be greater than when the semantic content is neutral (e.g., door).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%