1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0010-440x(99)90130-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alexithymia, hypochondriacal beliefs, and psychological distress among frequent attenders in primary health care

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies found a significant relationship between alexithymia and increased health care utilization [29][30][31]. However, it was suggested that distinct features of alexithymia may yield different effects on illness behavior, with difficulties in identifying feelings and externally-oriented thinking being significantly associated with increased and decreased use of outpatient medical treatments, respectively [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies found a significant relationship between alexithymia and increased health care utilization [29][30][31]. However, it was suggested that distinct features of alexithymia may yield different effects on illness behavior, with difficulties in identifying feelings and externally-oriented thinking being significantly associated with increased and decreased use of outpatient medical treatments, respectively [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jyvasjarvi et al [61] studied hypochondriasis and alexithymia in FAs, finding more hypochondriacal attitudes but no greater alexithymia compared to controls. Porcelli and De Carne [25] have reported that the DCPR alexithymia criteria may have lower sensitivity than the TAS-20 (the instrument used by Jyvasjarvi et al [61] to assess alexithymia). However, the claim of lower sensitivity is inconsistent with differences between FAs and controls in the prevalence of DCPR alexithymia in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another problematic issue is defining the number of consultations required for a patient to be considered a frequent attender. A Swedish study set the cut-off point at 5 or more consultations per year (5), whereas a Finnish study set it to 8 or 11 per year or upper 10% or 5% of total number of consultations (5,6). Defining the follow up time is also a problem, as well as finding a unique name for frequent attenders.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%