2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.enganabound.2017.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algebraic formulation of nonlinear surface impedance boundary condition coupled with BEM for unstructured meshes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, only the chassis of the car is considered and modeled as a surface mesh (see Figure 1c), since the numerical formulation is based on the SIBC method [11]. In order to investigate the effect of the car body shielding on the exposure assessment, two different materials were considered: aluminum and carbon fiber.…”
Section: Car Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this paper, only the chassis of the car is considered and modeled as a surface mesh (see Figure 1c), since the numerical formulation is based on the SIBC method [11]. In order to investigate the effect of the car body shielding on the exposure assessment, two different materials were considered: aluminum and carbon fiber.…”
Section: Car Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such unbounded multiscale problems are not easily solved using standard volume-based methods like finite elements. For this reason, a hybrid BEM/SIBC formulation was used [11]. The BEM accounts for the unbounded air domain and for the non-conductive magnetic materials, whereas the SIBC is used to model the eddy currents in thin conductive layers.…”
Section: Magnetic Field Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nevertheless, from the optimization point of view, this may imply more computational requirements and longer computation time, depending on the complexity of the analyzed system, so obtaining new analytical formulae for more realistic situations would lead to faster and more efficient optimization procedures for this mitigation technique. Nonetheless, new numerical approaches have been presented recently that may help in this task in the near future [104][105][106][107] since they drastically reduce the number of unknowns when dealing with thin shields, in comparison with FEM.…”
Section: Passive Shieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%