2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ic.2012.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algebraic independence and blackbox identity testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
36
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, if each variable occurs in at most n 1/2−ε (0 < ε < 1/2) many underlying sparse polynomials, it takes an exponential sized depth-4 circuit to compute Imm n. Our next result is an exponential lower bound on the model for which hittingset was developed in [BMS11a] (but no lower bound was shown). It is also an improvement over the result obtained in [GKPS11] which holds only for more restricted depth-4 circuits over reals.…”
Section: A Tale Of Two Pits (And Three Lower Bounds)mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, if each variable occurs in at most n 1/2−ε (0 < ε < 1/2) many underlying sparse polynomials, it takes an exponential sized depth-4 circuit to compute Imm n. Our next result is an exponential lower bound on the model for which hittingset was developed in [BMS11a] (but no lower bound was shown). It is also an improvement over the result obtained in [GKPS11] which holds only for more restricted depth-4 circuits over reals.…”
Section: A Tale Of Two Pits (And Three Lower Bounds)mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Our contribution, in this section, is an elementary proof of Theorem 2.3, which was originally proved in [BMS11a] using Krull's Hauptidealsatz. Here, we state the main properties of the Jacobian and faithful homomorphisms without proofs -for details, refer to [BMS11b] (or Appendix A.1).…”
Section: Preliminaries: Jacobian and Faith-ful Homomorphismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations