1985
DOI: 10.24033/asens.1495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algebraic $K$-theory and etale cohomology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
224
0
4

Year Published

1997
1997
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 243 publications
(231 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
3
224
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The first statement is [16,Theorem 1.5]. For the second statement, we employ Thomason's criterion [26,Prop. 2.3].…”
Section: And Hencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first statement is [16,Theorem 1.5]. For the second statement, we employ Thomason's criterion [26,Prop. 2.3].…”
Section: And Hencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper is concerned with the subject of homotopical sheaf theory, as it has developed over time in the articles [I,B,BG,Th,Jo,J1,J2,J3,J4]. Given a fixed Grothendieck site C, one wants to consider contravariant functors F defined on C whose values have a homotopy type associated to them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over C, comparison with the Atiyah-Hirzebruch spectral sequence for topological K-theory also yields examples where the Thomason descent spectral sequence of [48] does not degenerate, which strongly suggests that (1.3) should not degenerate in general (compare [50, §8] This is thanks to both Hoobler's Henselian pair trick [24] and the ThomasonTrobaugh descent theorem for the Bass extension of algebraic K-theory [51]. Theorem 3 suggests that a form of (1.3) exists even for singular schemes (I write a form because of negative K-groups, which remain mysterious at this stage), and also that Voevodsky's cdh cohomology (e.g.…”
Section: Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%