Psychophysical Judgment and Measurement 1974
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-161902-2.50015-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algebraic Models in Perception

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
147
0
1

Year Published

1977
1977
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
4
147
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The code Y would assume some value on each trial, and be compared with a criterion to effect response selection. The properties of this additive-effects model would be similar to those of both other statistical decision models (Green & Swets, 1966) and other models for the algebraic combination of sources of stimulus information (Anderson, 1974). These properties are also characteristic of a recent model for letter detection (Kinchla, 1974;Kinchla & Collyer, 1974).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The code Y would assume some value on each trial, and be compared with a criterion to effect response selection. The properties of this additive-effects model would be similar to those of both other statistical decision models (Green & Swets, 1966) and other models for the algebraic combination of sources of stimulus information (Anderson, 1974). These properties are also characteristic of a recent model for letter detection (Kinchla, 1974;Kinchla & Collyer, 1974).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Simple additive models have been used to fit a bimodal response function as a weighted average of the unimodal conditions (Anderson, 1974). In another manipulation known as intersensory conflict, the perceiver is presented with discrepant bimodal information about a single physical entity.…”
Section: Other Significant Issues Vision-touch Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apesar do sucesso deste procedimento no processo de validação das escalas psicofísicas com estímulos métricos e não métricos, tem havido, ainda, na literatura psicofísica, grandes debates se os métodos de escalonamento de razão fornecem mensuração em nível de razão, tanto para o escalonamento da sensação de dor, em particular (Gracely & Dubner, 1981;Hall, 1981), quanto para o escalonamento de sensações, em geral (Anderson, 1974;Da Silva & Macedo, 1983;Ekman, 1964;Sheppard, 1981;Warren & Warren, 1963;Zinner, 1969). Para aplicações na mensuração da dor, os julgamentos em nível de razão permitem afirmações significativas sobre mudanças na sensação de dor que são independentes da unidade psicológica de mensuração.…”
unclassified