2019
DOI: 10.1002/app.47599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alginate–chitosan composite hydrogel film with macrovoids in the inner layer for biomedical applications

Abstract: Making of a layered composite using two biopolymer gels with regularly aligned voids in the inner layer is described in this article. Calcium alginate constituted the inner layer, within which voids of 500 μm diameter were embedded in monolayer or in multiple layers using a fluidic device for bubbling. The chitosan without any additional crosslinker was used to form the outer layer. The layered structure enabled compartmentalization of drug hold‐up, and differential release rates. These aspects were reviewed u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to 1 H-NMR, hydroxyl ( OH), imine ( N CH), and methyl ( CH 3 ) protons of monomer were seen at 9.79, 7.66, and 1.39 ppm, respectively. In the structure of polymers, urethane ( NH), imine ( N CH), and methyl ( CH 3 ) protons were observed in the range from 9.79 to 9.80, 7.64 to 8.00, and 1.34 to 1.39 ppm, respectively.As can be seen in13 C-NMR data, hydroxyl ( C OH), imine ( N CH), and methyl ( CH 3 ) carbons of monomer were observed at 192.5, 167.5, and 30.3 ppm, respectively. Urethane ( C O), imine ( N CH), and methyl ( CH 3 ) carbons were also seen in the range from 192.2 to 192.4, 163.4 to 173.7, and 30.2 to 30.3 ppm, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to 1 H-NMR, hydroxyl ( OH), imine ( N CH), and methyl ( CH 3 ) protons of monomer were seen at 9.79, 7.66, and 1.39 ppm, respectively. In the structure of polymers, urethane ( NH), imine ( N CH), and methyl ( CH 3 ) protons were observed in the range from 9.79 to 9.80, 7.64 to 8.00, and 1.34 to 1.39 ppm, respectively.As can be seen in13 C-NMR data, hydroxyl ( C OH), imine ( N CH), and methyl ( CH 3 ) carbons of monomer were observed at 192.5, 167.5, and 30.3 ppm, respectively. Urethane ( C O), imine ( N CH), and methyl ( CH 3 ) carbons were also seen in the range from 192.2 to 192.4, 163.4 to 173.7, and 30.2 to 30.3 ppm, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Hydrogels can be obtained by using both natural polymers such as chitosan (CS), starch, or alginates, synthetic polymers such as poly(vinyl alcohol) or polyurethane, and so on. Compared with synthetic polymers, the natural polymers particularly fill the gaps that are needed in specific biomedical applications due to their good biological performance such as biodegradability, biocompatibility, abundance in nature, injectability, similarities to a cellular matrix and low‐cost production . Among the natural polymers, CS is an attractive candidate to obtain hydrogels and the properties of the prepared hydrogels such as biocompatibility, biodegradability, antibacterial effect, flexibility, and low toxicity have been significantly increased with the use of CS‐based polymer as raw material for fabricating hydrogels .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The calcium concentration in the original gel sample was found to be 4.7 wt%, whereas the calcium concentration in the exuded fluid dropped from 0.44 wt% to 0.28 wt%, even after the level of deformation was raised to 80%. This may be noted that the alginate gel releases calcium ion in exchange of sodium ion in the PBS buffer, thereby degrading the gel network within a few days 33,34 . Therefore, within the time frame of compression experiments and repeated overnight swelling, the release of calcium ion at a concentration level of 5–6% due to degradation is very much anticipated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different ways of associating alginate and chitosan have been de scribed in the literature: by mixing at room (Florczyk et al, 2011;Xu et al, 2019;Lv et al, 2019) or higher temperature (Fletcher et al, 2017), bilayer (Banerjee and Ganguly, 2019) or layer by layer (Silva et al, 2017) assemblies, crosslinking (Baysal et al, 2016;Naghizadeha et al, 2018, Zhang et al, 2018, 3D printing (Liu et al, 2018), … They lead to biocompatible buildings whose mechanical properties can be variable (Francis et al, 2013;Salehi et al, 2019;Lv et al, 2019;Xu et al, 2019), even up to correspond to the mechanical properties of hard tissues Florczyk et al, 2013). In this context our strategy was to let these biopolymers chemically unmodified, in order to maintain their excellent initial biocompatibility, and to work on the process to obtain a macroporous 3D architecture with improved rheo logical properties compared with reference polymers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%