2013
DOI: 10.1117/12.2029997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algorithm for cumulative damage probability calculations in S-on-1 laser damage testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each FJP-finished surface, ~ 100 testing sites were used. The damage probabilities were calculated using the “limit cumulative method” 26 and the LIDT values correspond to a damage probability of 5% to 10%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each FJP-finished surface, ~ 100 testing sites were used. The damage probabilities were calculated using the “limit cumulative method” 26 and the LIDT values correspond to a damage probability of 5% to 10%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The onset of laser damage was visualized by a detectable change in the localized scattering intensity in the irradiated region determined by subtraction of images recorded prior to and immediately after laser irradiation. The LIDT measurements reported in this work are expressed in terms of damage probability using the “limit cumulative” method 21 23 , which is designed to increase the statistical confidence when extensive testing is not possible. In the present study, we considered that damage testing could cause molecular decomposition due to ablation within the LC fluid that can result in an artificial lowering of the observed LIDT or LIFT values.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is determined for each focal length by plotting the damage probability for each pulse energy. The damage probability is calculated using a cumulative approach [5] by dividing the numbers of fibers damaged up to a specific pulse energy by the total number of fibers tested. A distinction was made between the different damage definitions and the different focal lengths of the focusing lens.…”
Section: Transmittable Pulse Energymentioning
confidence: 99%