2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jasms.2005.11.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algorithms for automatic interpretation of high resolution mass spectra

Abstract: Automated interpretation of high-resolution mass spectra in a reliable and efficient manner represents a highly challenging computational problem. This work aims at developing methods for reducing a high-resolution mass spectrum into its monoisotopic peak list, and automatically assigning observed masses to known fragment ion masses if the protein sequence is available. The methods are compiled into a suite of data reduction algorithms which is called MasSPIKE (Mass Spectrum Interpretation and Kernel Extractio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
61
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While not currently tested, it seems likely that improvements can be made to the peak centroiding algorithm, which will improve the accuracy of the Φ/ω pairs that are added to the least squares fit. Possible ways of improving centroiding algorithms include the use of a maximum likelihood peakfitting method [45], a center-of-mass calculation, a least-squares fit to a Lorentzian (or Lorentzian/sinc) function, apodization and fitting to a Gaussian function, or even use of the shifted-basis method [46]. In this work, none of …”
Section: Centroidingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While not currently tested, it seems likely that improvements can be made to the peak centroiding algorithm, which will improve the accuracy of the Φ/ω pairs that are added to the least squares fit. Possible ways of improving centroiding algorithms include the use of a maximum likelihood peakfitting method [45], a center-of-mass calculation, a least-squares fit to a Lorentzian (or Lorentzian/sinc) function, apodization and fitting to a Gaussian function, or even use of the shifted-basis method [46]. In this work, none of …”
Section: Centroidingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because of the presence of potentially overlapping charge states and significant peak widths, charge state assignment can still be challenging, particularly for polydisperse samples or in complex mixtures. As a result, a number of specialized algorithms have been proposed to deconvolute these spectra and identify the components [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Another approach is to minimize mass spectral complexity by reducing the charge state of the ions in the gas phase by means of Bcharge-stripping^ [13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spectra were analyzed by an in-house program called°MasSpike° [62],°similar°to°Thrash° [63],°which reduces each spectrum into the monoisotopic peak list of the fragment ions. This program operates by identifying isotopic clusters based on S/N ratio.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%