2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10589-013-9548-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algorithms for detecting optimal hereditary structures in graphs, with application to clique relaxations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other approaches based on branch and cut [30] and on combinatorial algorithms [31] have roughly comparable performance. The current-best algorithm for s-PLEX is also based on a combinatorial search tree algorithm, which exploits that the s-plex property is hereditary [32].…”
Section: S-plexmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other approaches based on branch and cut [30] and on combinatorial algorithms [31] have roughly comparable performance. The current-best algorithm for s-PLEX is also based on a combinatorial search tree algorithm, which exploits that the s-plex property is hereditary [32].…”
Section: S-plexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, given that s-PLEX can be solved quite efficiently in practice [29][30][31][32], an implementation of efficient fixed-parameter algorithms for s-BUNDLE seems clearly within reach.…”
Section: Open Topic 6 Perform a Multivariate Complexity Analysis Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models may be more practical on denser networks, however, the proposed scale reduction technique will not be applicable in this case, calling for alternative solution methods, such as a combinatorial branch-and-bound method similar to RDS [29,44]. As noted above, RDS is not directly applicable due to the lack of heredity property, however, it can be modified to address the cases when heredity is violated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once a vertex u is chosen from the RCL and the current solution is updated to S 0 { u } , the candidate list C must be updated to correspond to S 0 { u } . To construct the new candidate list, explicitly verifying if S 0 { u , v } is a k ‐plex for every v C { u } is very inefficient as reported in . However, this update can be done more efficiently based on the following properties.…”
Section: A New Grasp For K‐plex Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this update can be done more efficiently based on the following properties. Vertex v C { u } is no longer a candidate with respect to the solution S 0 { u } if one of the following conditions is true : v N ( u ) and | S 0 N ( v ) | = k 1 , There exists w S 0 N ( v ) such that | S 0 { u } N ( w ) | = k 1 . Under the first condition, v C { u } has exactly k −1 non‐neighbors in S 0 . As v is not adjacent to u , it must have k non‐neighbors in S 0 { u } .…”
Section: A New Grasp For K‐plex Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%