2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2021.103122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aligning stakeholders’ mental models on carsharing system using remote focus group method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Car-sharing services, i.e., short-term vehicle rental, have become widely available on six continents of the world. The great interest in services is mainly related to the flexibility and freedom of movement provided by vehicles [1,2]. Car-sharing services are generally well-received by society and municipal decision makers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Car-sharing services, i.e., short-term vehicle rental, have become widely available on six continents of the world. The great interest in services is mainly related to the flexibility and freedom of movement provided by vehicles [1,2]. Car-sharing services are generally well-received by society and municipal decision makers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, these studies often approach the visioning process with a supposition that the issues and desirable conditions of the transport system can be readily identified and agreed upon by stakeholders. We argue that identification and reaching a consensus on urban issues can be challenging, because, in addition to the uncertainties mentioned, each stakeholder may also have a unique mental model or perspective and an individual set of priorities on the subject concerned 17 .This research makes scientific contributions to the field of transport policy and decision-making process by highlighting gaps in the visioning process applied to transport cases, proposing a framework to resolve them, and illustrating its effectiveness in a case study. The systematic review is exploratory and focuses on (1) how related stakeholders and citizens were involved in the visioning process, (2) the methodologies utilized, particularly how they addressed the uncertainty surrounding the visions and their associated actions, and (3) the outcomes of the process (Sect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, these studies often approach the visioning process with a supposition that the issues and desirable conditions of the transport system can be readily identified and agreed upon by stakeholders. We argue that identification and reaching a consensus on urban issues can be challenging, because, in addition to the uncertainties mentioned, each stakeholder may also have a unique mental model or perspective and an individual set of priorities on the subject concerned 17 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%