2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-39477-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alignment-free similarity analysis for protein sequences based on fuzzy integral

Abstract: Sequence comparison is an essential part of modern molecular biology research. In this study, we estimated the parameters of Markov chain by considering the frequencies of occurrence of the all possible amino acid pairs from each alignment-free protein sequence. These estimated Markov chain parameters were used to calculate similarity between two protein sequences based on a fuzzy integral algorithm. For validation, our result was compared with both alignment-based (ClustalW) and alignment-free methods on six … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
63
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
4
63
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We use MEGA7 to construct a phylogenetic tree for each dataset. Our constructed phylogenetic trees are then compared with the results obtained from some other advanced genome sequence comparison methods like Feature Frequency Profiles (FFP) method [ 30 ], Fuzzy Integral Similarity method [ 34 ], ClustalW method, Multiple Encoding Vector method [ 40 ], Fast Vector method [ 40 ], Weighted Measure method [ 42 ], Probabilistic method [ 23 ], K-mer method [ 29 ]. From the results, we can see the efficiency in terms of time complexity and accuracy of our new method is better than or equal to all other previously published methods on the same datasets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We use MEGA7 to construct a phylogenetic tree for each dataset. Our constructed phylogenetic trees are then compared with the results obtained from some other advanced genome sequence comparison methods like Feature Frequency Profiles (FFP) method [ 30 ], Fuzzy Integral Similarity method [ 34 ], ClustalW method, Multiple Encoding Vector method [ 40 ], Fast Vector method [ 40 ], Weighted Measure method [ 42 ], Probabilistic method [ 23 ], K-mer method [ 29 ]. From the results, we can see the efficiency in terms of time complexity and accuracy of our new method is better than or equal to all other previously published methods on the same datasets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 ), with phylogenetic trees (Supplementary Figs. S1, S2, S3, and S4) constructed by other methods [ 30 , 34 , 40 ] shown in the supplementary file. According to the Feature frequency profiles (FFP) [ 30 ] method using k = 7 shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations