2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2006.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alkyne oligomerization mediated by rhodium complexes with a phosphinosulfonamido ligand and isolation and characterization of a rhodacyclopentadiene complex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most significant difference concerns the angle P1–C2–C1, which is narrower in the rhodium complexes [ 5 : 112.44(17)°; 6 : 112.6(2)°] than in the lithium derivatives [ 1 : 120.18(9)°; 2 : 115.304(17)°], most likely to ensure better overlap between the phosphorus lone pair and the rhodium‐based orbitals. The resulting Rh–P bond of 2.3235(7) Å in [Rh(dbnP)(cod)] ( 5 ) is slightly longer than in [Rh(dbuP)(cod)] ( 6 ) [Rh–P 2.2719(7) Å] and the related amido–phosphine‐stabilized square‐planar rhodium complexes [Rh( P , N ‐Ph 2 PAr – )(cod)] [Rh–P 2.2534(3) Å; P , N ‐Ph 2 PAr – = P , N ‐diphenyl( o ‐ N ‐methylanilido)phosphine] and [Rh(Ph 2 PCH 2 CH 2 NTs)(cod)] [Rh–P 2.2606(6) Å; Ts = p ‐toluenesulfonyl] . The bond lengths towards and within the cod ligands in 5 and 6 agree well with the values reported for these known derivatives and therefore need no further discussion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most significant difference concerns the angle P1–C2–C1, which is narrower in the rhodium complexes [ 5 : 112.44(17)°; 6 : 112.6(2)°] than in the lithium derivatives [ 1 : 120.18(9)°; 2 : 115.304(17)°], most likely to ensure better overlap between the phosphorus lone pair and the rhodium‐based orbitals. The resulting Rh–P bond of 2.3235(7) Å in [Rh(dbnP)(cod)] ( 5 ) is slightly longer than in [Rh(dbuP)(cod)] ( 6 ) [Rh–P 2.2719(7) Å] and the related amido–phosphine‐stabilized square‐planar rhodium complexes [Rh( P , N ‐Ph 2 PAr – )(cod)] [Rh–P 2.2534(3) Å; P , N ‐Ph 2 PAr – = P , N ‐diphenyl( o ‐ N ‐methylanilido)phosphine] and [Rh(Ph 2 PCH 2 CH 2 NTs)(cod)] [Rh–P 2.2606(6) Å; Ts = p ‐toluenesulfonyl] . The bond lengths towards and within the cod ligands in 5 and 6 agree well with the values reported for these known derivatives and therefore need no further discussion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CCCO moieties are alkynyl ketones (RCCCOR′), alkynyl esters (RCCCOOR′), alkynyl diesters (ROOCCCCOOR′), etc. The metal atoms of the metal compounds such as Mn, Re, Fe, Ru, Os, Rh, Ir, Ni, Pd and Pt are used for these cyclization reactions 84–113. In the CCCO moiety, the metal is coordinated at two coordination sites: the alkynyl π‐electron bond and the carbonyl oxygen atom.…”
Section: Synthesis Of Carbonyl Group‐containing Organometallic Intrammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It involves the reaction of [{RhCl(CO) 2 } 2 ] with urea to form the coordinatively unsaturated monomeric intermediate A, [15] which undergoes oxidative coupling with alkynes to form rhodacyclopentadiene intermediate B, and subsequent insertion of CO and the formation of cyclopentadienone-coordinated rhodium intermediate C, followed by selective hydrogenation to afford 2 and/or 3. The rhodacyclopentadiene complex B from the reaction of rhodium complex with alkynes, [16] and cyclopentadienone-coordinated complex C [17] have been well studied. Furthermore, rhodium-catalyzed selective hydroge- nation of C-type compounds to 2-cyclopenten-1-one has been also reported.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%