2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

All-Arthroscopic versus Mini-Open Repair of Small to Large Sized Rotator Cuff Tears: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes

Abstract: PurposeThe purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of patients with full-thickness small to large sized tears undergoing all-arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair.MethodA literature search for electronic databases and references for eligible studies was conducted through Medline, Embase and Cochrane library between 1969 and 2013.ResultsA total of 12 comparative studies (n = 770 patients) were included. Pooled results showed: there were no differences in function outcome, pain scores,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
30
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While the current study provides support for the use of this collagen implant in preventing retears in this population, additional studies are needed to further document the ability of the implant to limit re-tearing in medium, as well as in larger (> 3 cm) rotator cuff lesions. In addition, although patients in the current study underwent either arthroscopic or miniopen repair, studies have shown no difference in clinical outcomes or re-tear rates 29,30 . Similar results have also been reported for outcomes and re-tear rates using single-or double-row suture repair techniques 15 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…While the current study provides support for the use of this collagen implant in preventing retears in this population, additional studies are needed to further document the ability of the implant to limit re-tearing in medium, as well as in larger (> 3 cm) rotator cuff lesions. In addition, although patients in the current study underwent either arthroscopic or miniopen repair, studies have shown no difference in clinical outcomes or re-tear rates 29,30 . Similar results have also been reported for outcomes and re-tear rates using single-or double-row suture repair techniques 15 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…[28,29] MO repair is an alternative surgery pattern to combine the advantages of arthroscopic and open repair without taking down the deltoid origin. The arthroscopic technique is believed to cause less pain and allows for better recovery in the earlier postoperative period, which can reduce the patients’ off-work period and thereby reduce the disease-associated costs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some important factors exist influencing the incidence of rotator cuff retear, including tear size, preoperative duration of symptoms, degeneration of cuff, fixation technique, and the hardware used. [28] …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An arthroscopic or mini-open surgical technique may be employed, with comparable outcomes. 40 Both double-row sutureanchor repair and transosseous fixation techniques have been described, but no biomechanical or clinical studies have been done that compare them in terms of strength or functional outcome for avulsion-type fractures. Arthroscopic repair can be performed by a surgeon experienced in shoulder arthroscopy.…”
Section: Avulsion-type Fracturesmentioning
confidence: 99%