All-ceramic materials in dentistry

Teja, Samarjit Singh; Teja, Prerna Hoogan

doi:10.4103/2454-3160.177930

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Dentists today can choose from a variety of metal ceramic and all-ceramic materials in dentistry, available for fabrication of ceramic restorations. (5) This review outlines the developments in the evolution of dental ceramics over the last century and considers the state of the art in the several extended and innovative applications of dental ceramics.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Ceramics – Shadow of Enamel : an Overview

Agrawal¹,

Sinhmar²,

Makka³

et al. 2020

J Current Med Res Opinion

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Extended & innovative applications of ceramics in dentistry (37,38) • CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION CMRO 03 (08), 549−562 (2020)…”

Section: Problems In Reproducing Natural Teeth Colors In Ceramics Resmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ceramics – Shadow of Enamel : an Overview

Agrawal¹,

Sinhmar²,

Makka³

et al. 2020

J Current Med Res Opinion

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Lithium disilicate glass ceramic that has undergone CAD/CAM processing has a flexural strength of 360 MPa. It is used in inlays, onlays, veneers, implant crowns, and anterior or posterior crowns [7].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Marginal chipping factor in machinable zirconia and lithium disilicate ceramic veneer restorations

H. Hasan,

Malallah,

Hazim Qasim

2024

IJDM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background:The marginal edges of the laminate veneer ceramic restorations are very critical areas that play a very determinant role in the success of this type of esthetic restorations.Aim:To evaluate the marginal chipping factor of laminate veneer restorations prepared from both zirconia lithium disilicate materials. Materials and methods:Two typodont teeth representing the upper central incisors were used to prepare laminate veneers with an overlapping incisal design. These veneers were fabricated in two thicknesses (0.5 mm and 0.3 mm) using three types of multilayer zirconia materials with varying yttria percentages (3Y, 5Y, and 3Y/5Y) as well as lithium disilicate computer-aided-design (CAD) blocks. The veneers were divided into four groups based on the yttria percentage and further subdivided into two subgroups for the thickness. Top-view images of the veneer margins were captured and imported into the Image Pro Plus software. The average periphery of each veneer margin was 30 mm. The lengths of the chipped margins were measured under a stereomicroscope, and the CF was calculated.Results: One-way ANOVAsuggested significant differences among the ceramics. e.max CAD ceramic veneers exhibited the highest mean CF values (4.72, 5.9), whereas 3Y/5Y zirconia veneers demonstrated the lowest mean CF values (0.74, 1.54) for 0.5 mm and 0.3 mm thicknesses, respectively. Independent t-tests indicated no significant difference in the CF between 0.5 mm and 0.3 mm thicknesses for each ceramic material.Conclusion:Different ceramic materials exhibited varying levels of marginal chipping, with zirconia ceramics demonstrating lower CF than lithium disilicate ceramics. Reducing the veneer thickness from 0.5 mm to 0.3 mm did not significantly affect the CF.

show abstract