2020
DOI: 10.2981/wlb.00760
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

All forests are not equal: population demographics and denning behaviour of a recovering small carnivore in human modified landscapes

Abstract: BioOne Complete (complete.BioOne.org) is a full-text database of 200 subscribed and open-access titles in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We divided Northern Ireland into 14 402 1 km 2 grid squares and each covariate was summarized at the 1 km 2 scale. A 1 km 2 resolution was selected for two reasons: (i) it approximates the home range size of a female pine marten, being the largest of the three species [ 13 ]; and (ii) it is a typical intuitive map scale frequently used at regional and national scales. It is true that squirrels have smaller home ranges (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We divided Northern Ireland into 14 402 1 km 2 grid squares and each covariate was summarized at the 1 km 2 scale. A 1 km 2 resolution was selected for two reasons: (i) it approximates the home range size of a female pine marten, being the largest of the three species [ 13 ]; and (ii) it is a typical intuitive map scale frequently used at regional and national scales. It is true that squirrels have smaller home ranges (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heterogeneity in the structure and configuration of habitat can mediate predator–prey interactions through its influence on the density and type of functional response exhibited by predators [ 12 , 13 ]. Habitat is a determining factor in the hunting capacity of predators, and the ability of prey to detect, avoid, or escape predators [ 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among European carnivores, members of the family Mustelidae frequently live in urban or peri-urban areas or utilize agricultural landscapes [ 6 ]. Their populations are also increasing in several European countries [ 7 , 8 ]. Importantly, mustelids are frequently kept in captivity as household pets [ 9 ] and may become tick-infested when they are walked, increasing the significance of knowledge on their tick-borne pathogens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T A B L E 3 Coefficient of variation of the mean (CV mean ) results for each of the density estimates using five different methods; unmarked spatial capture-recapture (SCR) with moderately informative prior (uSCRm) and with a strongly informative prior (uSCRs) applied to camera-trap data, random encounter models (REM) applied to camera-trap data, distance sampling applied to camera-trap data (CT-DS), normal SCR applied to genetic noninvasive sampling (gNIS), and normal SCR applied to live trapping. individuals/km 2 ; Zalewski & Jedrzejewski, 2006) and Ireland where densities are highest for the species (0.12-4.42 individuals/km 2 ; Mullins et al, 2010;Sheehy et al, 2013;O'Mahony et al, 2017;Twining, Montgomery, Reid, et al, 2020). Despite similar point estimates from all five methods sitting within each other's CIs, differences in the precision, cost, and effort of each method were apparent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This study sheds light on the precision, efficacy, and cost of increasingly used noninvasive methods for monitoring animal populations and conventional live trapping. Using methods applied to both marked and unmarked animal populations, we produce density estimates within reported ranges for the target species in Europe (0.01–1.75 individuals/km 2 ; Zalewski & Jedrzejewski, 2006) and Ireland where densities are highest for the species (0.12–4.42 individuals/km 2 ; Mullins et al, 2010; Sheehy et al, 2013; O'Mahony et al, 2017; Twining, Montgomery, Reid, et al, 2020). Despite similar point estimates from all five methods sitting within each other's CIs, differences in the precision, cost, and effort of each method were apparent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%