2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.10.23.349407
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alleloscope: Integrative single cell analysis of allele-specific copy number alterations and chromatin accessibility in cancer

Abstract: Cancer progression is driven by both somatic copy number aberrations (CNAs) and chromatin remodeling, yet little is known about the interplay between these two classes of events in shaping the clonal diversity of cancers. We present Alleloscope, a method for allele-specific copy number estimation that can be applied to single cell DNA and ATAC sequencing data, either separately or in combination. This approach allows for integrative multi-omic analysis of allele-specific copy number and chromatin accessibility… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, these included focal amplifications of oncogenes such as KRAS, CCNE1 and MYC. Meanwhile, we suggest that pervasive parallel copy number events 10,14,29 in general are a consequence of underlying levels of instability rather than positive selection. On the other hand, how rarer events modify tumour cell fitness remains uncertain, and will require integration of single cell data with evolutionary models of genomic instability 30,31 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Notably, these included focal amplifications of oncogenes such as KRAS, CCNE1 and MYC. Meanwhile, we suggest that pervasive parallel copy number events 10,14,29 in general are a consequence of underlying levels of instability rather than positive selection. On the other hand, how rarer events modify tumour cell fitness remains uncertain, and will require integration of single cell data with evolutionary models of genomic instability 30,31 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Unlike other aggregate statistics such as the mirrored BAF (mBAF) [32] or the squared log-odds ratio [33], the mhBAF quantifies the frequency of a specific haplotype across samples, which HATCHet2 uses to identify haplotype-specific CNAs and assign them to tumor clones. To compute mhBAF in HATCHet2, we develop an expectation-maximization algorithm to compute a pseudomaximum likelihood estimate for the mhBAF across different bulk tumor samples by extending existing approaches that have been introduced for single-cell analysis [17,69].…”
Section: Hatchet2 Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference-based phasing methods [58][59][60]90] exploit this structure using a large database of known haplotypes to identify SNPs that are likely to be grouped together. Following the approach in several previous CNA inference methods [17,24,25,28,69], HATCHet2 applies a reference-based phasing algorithm to infer the phase of alleles across whole chromosomes. Since the accuracy of phasing decreases with genetic distance [91], we use the inferred phase to group together SNPs into haplotype blocks with a user-defined maximum length (25 kilobases by default).…”
Section: Genotyping and Reference-based Snp Phasingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Zhang's group has applied Alleloscope to primary breast tumor and primary and metastasized colorectal and gastric tumors, revealing pervasive intratumor heterogeneity, including highly complex multiallelic copy number aberrations differentiated by haplotype ratios that have previously been underappreciated or ignored. 69 Jean Fan from Johns Hopkins University presented work using computational modeling to infer changes in cellular state from spatially resolved transcriptomic imaging data. Fan's group applies multiplexed error-robust FISH (MERFISH), which uses combinatorial labeling, barcoding, and sequential imaging, to profile spatially resolved genome-wide transcriptomes in single cells within fixed cultures and tissues.…”
Section: Computational Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%