2001
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2001.045001058.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Allergic contact dermatitis from sodium pyrithione in metalworking fluid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…being a more practical diluent than aq. (1), but our patient did not react to zinc pyrithione on patch testing, even though he was tested with a higher concentration than he was with sodium pyrithione (sodium pyrithione 0.1% = 0.007 mol; zinc pyrithione 1.0% = 0.032 mol). This discrepancy may be due to different absorption from the 2 vehicles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…being a more practical diluent than aq. (1), but our patient did not react to zinc pyrithione on patch testing, even though he was tested with a higher concentration than he was with sodium pyrithione (sodium pyrithione 0.1% = 0.007 mol; zinc pyrithione 1.0% = 0.032 mol). This discrepancy may be due to different absorption from the 2 vehicles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The patient was allergic to sodium pyrithione (0.1% aq., Chemotechnique Diagnostics, Malmö, Sweden), tested twice to confirm the diagnosis. Sodium pyrithione is purchased by Chemotechnique Diagnostics as a 40% solution in water, termed sodium omadine, but the patch test concentration is 0.1% active ingredient (personal communication, Chemotechnique Diagnostics, Malmö, Sweden) (1). Sodium pyrithione was a component of his MWF, present at 0.1–1.0%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations