1968
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.1968.01610100057008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Allergy to Perfumes From Toilet Soaps and Detergents in Patients With Dermatitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though our patients often undertook normal domestic duties, it is apparent that their exposure to perfumes was diminished because in the hospital, nonperfumed items are commonly used. Perfume allergy is often associated with dermatitis of the hands and forearms (Hjorth 1961, Rothenburg & Hjorth 1968) as in our material, as 70% of the perfume sensitive subjects had suffered from hand dermatitis. Nickel was the most common individual allergen, conforming with earlier observations (Wilkinson et al 1970.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Though our patients often undertook normal domestic duties, it is apparent that their exposure to perfumes was diminished because in the hospital, nonperfumed items are commonly used. Perfume allergy is often associated with dermatitis of the hands and forearms (Hjorth 1961, Rothenburg & Hjorth 1968) as in our material, as 70% of the perfume sensitive subjects had suffered from hand dermatitis. Nickel was the most common individual allergen, conforming with earlier observations (Wilkinson et al 1970.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…In investigations from Germany, North America and Singapore, an increased frequency of reactions to the fragrance mix has also been detected within recent years, 3 , 4 , 16 while no increase has been seen in the U.K. 17 The use of fragrances is not covered by any official regulations, which is in contrast to other ingredients in cosmetics, such as preservatives. Balsam of Peru has also been used as an indicator of perfume allergy; 18 however, no changes in the prevalence of positive reactions were seen in the study period ( Fig. 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Since the 1960s, MP has been used as a marker for fragrance sensitivity, as it was discovered that half of the patients with positive reactions to MP are also sensitive to one or more toilet soap perfumes and vice versa. [2][3][4] In this article, various aspects of contact allergy to MP are reviewed, including its chemical composition, the frequency of sensitization, the sensitizers, the relevance of positive reactions, the MPcontaining products causing allergic contact dermatitis, the use of restrictive diets in patients reacting to MP, and co-reactivity with other fragrance and non-fragrance materials. An attempt is made to establish the significance of positive patch test reactions to MP and the value of testing MP in the baseline series.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%