2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00382-017-3760-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alleviating tropical Atlantic sector biases in the Kiel climate model by enhancing horizontal and vertical atmosphere model resolution: climatology and interannual variability

Abstract: We investigate the quality of simulating tropical Atlantic (TA) sector climatology and interannual variability in integrations of the Kiel Climate Model (KCM) with varying atmosphere model resolution. The ocean model resolution is kept fixed. A reasonable simulation of TA sector annual-mean climate, seasonal cycle and interannual variability can only be achieved at sufficiently high horizontal and vertical atmospheric resolution. Two major reasons for the improvements are identified. First, the western equator… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
44
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
6
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During this period, wind stress curl is at its maximum while alongshore wind stress is weak, coinciding with an offshore displacement of the zero‐wind stress curl contour. These results underline the importance of the precise cross‐shore wind structure for correctly simulating the EBC in upwelling regions that has been suggested previously (Fennel et al, ; Harlaß et al, , ; Junker et al, ; McCreary & Chao, ; Patricola & Chang, ; Small et al, ). Underneath the MC in the lCW layer, average flow was equatorward during both seasons.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…During this period, wind stress curl is at its maximum while alongshore wind stress is weak, coinciding with an offshore displacement of the zero‐wind stress curl contour. These results underline the importance of the precise cross‐shore wind structure for correctly simulating the EBC in upwelling regions that has been suggested previously (Fennel et al, ; Harlaß et al, , ; Junker et al, ; McCreary & Chao, ; Patricola & Chang, ; Small et al, ). Underneath the MC in the lCW layer, average flow was equatorward during both seasons.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…These results also suggest that reducing the Atlantic SST bias across coupled models should still be a priority for model developers, as it is difficult to make assessments of the likelihood of future wetting or drying while these biases persist. Recent work by Harlaß et al () has found that increased horizontal and vertical model resolution contributes to improvements in model representation of the tropical Atlantic climatology. Improving resolution may therefore be an important element of reducing this bias in future generations of coupled models.…”
Section: Discussion and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work by Harlaß et al (2018) has found that increased horizontal and vertical model resolution contributes to improvements in model representation of the tropical Atlantic climatology. Improving resolution may therefore be an important element of reducing this bias in future generations of coupled models.…”
Section: 1029/2018jd029847mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, Harlaß el al. [10] pointed out that higher resolution of the atmospheric component in the CCM is also crucial for reducing the warm SST bias over the ACT region. In the future, a high-resolution ocean model should be used to quantify the role of atmospheric variable biases in inducing SST biases over the ACT region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the southeastern tropical Atlantic (SETA) region (25 • S-10 • S, 10 • W-15 • E), the warm SST bias is mainly concentrated in the Angola-Benguela Frontal Zone [3,[6][7][8][9][10][11][12] (ABFZ) with a magnitude that exceeds 5 • C (IPCC 2013). The origins of the warm bias over the ABFZ have already been attributed to both local sources [4,5,[9][10][11] and remote sources [4,13]. Local sources include underestimated low-level winds [1,11,[14][15][16][17][18] and insufficient stratocumulus cloud cover [19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%