Alliance of antagonism: Counterpublics and polarization in online climate change communication

Abstract

Debates around climate change are a prominent example of polarized online communication. We examine the German climate hyperlink network and evaluate the degree to which it is shaped by mainstream and skeptical views. By combining the theoretical frameworks of the networked public sphere and counterpublics, we describe the relation between publics and counterpublics and discuss the role of hyperlinks in delineating communities. Our analysis of blogrolls and link lists shows the debate’s structures to be polarized along factional lines with political and scientific institutions supporting the mainstream “climate-friendly” position. We find that skeptics form a counterpublic that is only loosely connected to the mainstream as neither skeptics nor the mainstream want to be affiliated with each other. Skeptics, thus, are mostly excluded within the German online climate network. However, skeptics are part of an “alliance of antagonism” with other groups, such as conspiracy theorists, men’s right groups, and right-wing sites.

Discursive construction of migrant otherness on Facebook: A distributional semantics approach

“…At the same time, the presence of these competitive narratives of solidarity with migrants versus the narratives of migrant otherness provides some evidence for a possible polarisation of the Facebook audience. This suggestion can be supported by results of previous studies finding that social media audiences are considerably polarised based on their ideological stances [49].…”

Climate Change Risk Perceptions of Audiences in the Climate Change Blogosphere

“…Next to that, there are various communities of bloggers that support the scientific consensus on climate change ("climate mainstream bloggers") [7], for example climate scientists that blog to correct misinformation on climate change [11]. Previous studies showed that persistent polarization around climate change manifests itself in online communities and topics [7], hyperlinking [12,13], bloggers' operationalization of journalistic norms [11], discursive constructions of reality [14,15], and interaction strategies in comment threads [16] of the climate change blogosphere. Importantly, to date, little research has focused on audiences in the climate change blogosphere.…”

Converging on a nativist core? Comparing issues on the Facebook pages of the Pegida movement and the Alternative for Germany

“…Computational methods represent a set of tools for the analysis of digital traces which are increasingly being used in the interdisciplinary study of communication and media. Examples include network and link analysis supported by crawlers and application programming interfaces (APIs; Himelboim et al., 2013; Kaiser and Puschmann, 2017), sentiment analysis (Ceron et al., 2014; Young and Soroka, 2012), the use of supervised machine learning methods for automated content analysis (Schwartz and Ungar, 2015; Van Atteveldt et al., 2008) and topic modelling (Jacobi et al., 2016; Rauchfleisch, 2017).…”