2013
DOI: 10.1177/0003122413508285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alliances and Perception Profiles in the Iranian Reform Movement, 1997 to 2005

Abstract: What accounts for the formation and disintegration of social movement alliances? The dominant approach in social movement studies stresses the role of political opportunities and threats in facilitating or undermining alliances between oppositional groups. This article argues, by contrast, that the convergence and divergence of contenders’ perceptions mediate between political opportunities and shifting alliances. Whereas previous studies conceptualize perceptions as global assessments of actors’ environments,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A range of threats, genuine or perceived (Bandy & Smith, 2005;Grossman, 2001;Kadivar, 2013), provoke organizational collaboration, spanning from the presence of antagonistic political actors at various levels, such as Governors or Presidents or WTO leaders (Levi & Murphy, 2006;Gerhards & Rucht, 1992;Van Dyke, 2003), to hostile employers (Anner & Evans, 2004;Brecher & Costello, 1990;Dixon & Martin, 2012), and even mortal threats such as violence or war (Okamoto, 2010;Reese et al, 2010;Van Dyke & Cress, 2006). Chang (2008) finds government repression of protest spurred the creation of alliances in South Korea's pro-democracy movement.…”
Section: Ideology Culture and Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A range of threats, genuine or perceived (Bandy & Smith, 2005;Grossman, 2001;Kadivar, 2013), provoke organizational collaboration, spanning from the presence of antagonistic political actors at various levels, such as Governors or Presidents or WTO leaders (Levi & Murphy, 2006;Gerhards & Rucht, 1992;Van Dyke, 2003), to hostile employers (Anner & Evans, 2004;Brecher & Costello, 1990;Dixon & Martin, 2012), and even mortal threats such as violence or war (Okamoto, 2010;Reese et al, 2010;Van Dyke & Cress, 2006). Chang (2008) finds government repression of protest spurred the creation of alliances in South Korea's pro-democracy movement.…”
Section: Ideology Culture and Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Dix (1984) suggests, revolutions only succeed when a broad "negative" coalition of various actors from different segments of society band together to resist a regime. Along with states under external strain, the importance of coalitions is a consistent finding of revolution research (e.g., Beck 2015;Chang 2015;Foran 2005;Foran and Goodwin 1993;Kadivar 2013;Markoff 1988Markoff , 1996aSlater 2010).…”
Section: The Contemporary Schemas Of Revolution: State-centered and Mmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Analyzing the reform movement in general and not focusing on the student uprisings of 1999, Kadivar () looks for reasons that led to considerable cooperation and unity among different reformist groups in the early years of Khatamii's administration. Kadivar () concludes that different political groups made alliances based on their perception of political opportunities and what they viewed as the solution to bringing about their desired change.…”
Section: Post‐revolutionary Iran: Rise Of the Reform Movement The Stmentioning
confidence: 99%