2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12865-020-0340-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Allo-HSCT compared with immunosuppressive therapy for acquired aplastic anemia: a system review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) and immunosuppressive therapy (IST) are two major competing treatment strategies for acquired aplastic anemia (AA). Whether allo-HSCT is superior to IST as a front-line treatment for patients with AA has been a subject of debate. To compare the efficacy and safety of allo-HSCT with that of IST as a front-line treatment for patients with AA, we performed a meta-analysis of available studies that examined the impact of the two major compe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To the editor Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) and immunosuppressive therapy (IST) are the two main treatment strategies for newly diagnosed severe aplastic anemia (SAA) [1]. In spite of comparable overall survival (OS) between matched related donor-HSCT (MRD-HSCT) and IST, failure-free survival (FFS) has been reported to often be better in the former than the latter [2,3], mainly because of a low rate of complete response (CR) and relatively high rate of relapse and clonal evolution after IST treatment [4]. In recent years, the addition of eltrombopag (EPAG), an oral synthetic small-molecule thrombopoietin receptor agonist, to standard IST has been shown to improve the speed and depth of a hematological response in patients with SAA, without additional toxic effects [5,6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the editor Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) and immunosuppressive therapy (IST) are the two main treatment strategies for newly diagnosed severe aplastic anemia (SAA) [1]. In spite of comparable overall survival (OS) between matched related donor-HSCT (MRD-HSCT) and IST, failure-free survival (FFS) has been reported to often be better in the former than the latter [2,3], mainly because of a low rate of complete response (CR) and relatively high rate of relapse and clonal evolution after IST treatment [4]. In recent years, the addition of eltrombopag (EPAG), an oral synthetic small-molecule thrombopoietin receptor agonist, to standard IST has been shown to improve the speed and depth of a hematological response in patients with SAA, without additional toxic effects [5,6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has to be emphasized that the choice of initial treatment for patients with newly diagnosed AA still requires a comprehensive evaluation of donor availability, patient age, expected quality of life, and the risk of disease relapse or clonal evolution after IST [94].…”
Section: Survival After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30%-40% of patients showed no response to treatment with antithymocyte globulin (ATG), which will also consume platelets. Allo-HSCT is considered as the rst-line treatment for young and adult patients who may have an HLA-matched sibling donor (MSD) [6][7][8]. A study conducted by the Severe Aplastic Anemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (SAAWP-EBMT) showed that graft-versus-host diseasefree, relapse-free survival (GRFS) of allo-HSCT for AA was only 69% over 5 years [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%