2012
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Allometry of Sexual Size Dimorphism in Domestic Dog

Abstract: BackgroundThe tendency for male-larger sexual size dimorphism (SSD) to scale with body size – a pattern termed Rensch's rule – has been empirically supported in many animal lineages. Nevertheless, its theoretical elucidation is a subject of debate. Here, we exploited the extreme morphological variability of domestic dog (Canis familiaris) to gain insights into evolutionary causes of this rule.Methodology/Principal FindingsWe studied SSD and its allometry among 74 breeds ranging in height from less than 19 cm i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sutter et al (2008) studied 27 body measurements of 109 dog breeds and determined that male/female proportions were maintained in small and large breeds thus Rensch's rule cannot occur. However, Frynta et al (2012) using shoulder height of 74 breeds obtained a significant positive allometric relationship between male and female size consistent with Rensch's rule. The occurrence of Rensch's rule in domestic dogs was confirmed by us using body mass as well as height at withers and there is little doubt that the trend exists.…”
Section: Rensch's Rule In Domestic Dogs and Catssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sutter et al (2008) studied 27 body measurements of 109 dog breeds and determined that male/female proportions were maintained in small and large breeds thus Rensch's rule cannot occur. However, Frynta et al (2012) using shoulder height of 74 breeds obtained a significant positive allometric relationship between male and female size consistent with Rensch's rule. The occurrence of Rensch's rule in domestic dogs was confirmed by us using body mass as well as height at withers and there is little doubt that the trend exists.…”
Section: Rensch's Rule In Domestic Dogs and Catssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…SSD of domesticated animals has received some attention (e. g. Lark et al, 2006;Sutter et al, 2008;Polák, Frynta, 2010;Remĕs, Székely, 2010;Frynta et al, 2012) because it is well known that the process of domestication is usually accompanied by a "domestication syndrome". One of the "symptoms" of this syndrome is a generalized decrease in body size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nuestros resultados han mostrado claramente que la regla de Rensch no se aplica a los Félidos y que el SSD y la masa corporal muestran patrones de distribución filogenética absolutamente no coincidentes a pesar de ser una familia esencialmente poligínica. Los cánidos, monógamos, tampoco presentan un patron de escalamiento entre SSD y tamaño corporal consistente con la regla de Rensch a nivel interespecífico (Bidau y Martínez, datos no publicados) aunque las razas del perro doméstico parecen cumplirla según algunos estudios (Frynta et al 2012) pero no según otros (Sutter et al 2008). De todos modos, las razas caninas son producto de la selección artificial y por lo tanto estos resultados no son probablemente relevantes al problema de la regla de Rensch en la naturaleza.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…In the present study, SSD was calculated as the logarithm of the mean male to mean female height ratio, representing the differences between logarithms of the male and female height: (ln(M/F) 5 ln M 2 ln F). This is the most commonly used method to estimate SSD and is used with slight variations in all recent research with sexually dimorphic species of animals, for example fruit flies (Testa et al, 2013), frogs and toads (Liao et al, 2013), ground squirrels (Mat ejů and Kratochv ıl, 2013), dogs (Frynta et al, 2012), and non-human primates, extinct hominins, and living people (Plavcan, 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%