Many receptors display conformational flexibility, in which the binding pocket has an open inactive conformation in the absence of ligand and a tight active conformation when bound to ligand. Here we study the bacterial adhesin FimH to address the role of the inactive conformation of the pocket for initiating binding by comparing two variants: a wild-type FimH variant that is in the inactive state when not bound to its target mannose, and an engineered activated variant that is always in the active state. Not surprisingly, activated FimH has a longer lifetime and higher affinity, and bacteria expressing activated FimH bound better in static conditions. However, bacteria expressing wild-type FimH bound better in flow.
It is now known that few proteins recognize ligands through a lock and key mechanism, in which the binding pocket is in essentially the same conformation whether or not ligand is bound. Instead, the conformation of the binding pocket is usually dynamic. Conformational dynamics have many functions for receptors as well as enzymes, so for simplicity, we will use the term ligand to describe substrates and products as well as molecules that are not changed by binding. For allosteric proteins, an obvious function of conformational changes in the pocket is to allow regulation of ligand binding by an allosteric effector. For other proteins, flexibility in the binding pocket allows proteins to bind structurally distinct ligands (1), which may in turn facilitate evolution of new structures and functions (2, 3). In many cases, the inactive conformation of the pocket is relatively loose, and the active conformation tightens around the ligand, often due to the closing of a hinge (4) between two domains, or loops that are described as a gate (e.g., refs. 5-7) or a lid (e.g., refs. 8-11) because they close over the ligand in binding pocket. The ability of the pocket to close around different ligands can contribute to specificity (5). Switching to the inactive state of the receptor dramatically increases the dissociation rate, so pocket dynamics controls the residence time of ligands (4, 12), and thus the catalytic rate of most enzymes (3). The importance of the inactive state to association rates is less clear; inactive states have been shown have lower (4, 12), similar (13), or higher (14) association rates relative to the active state, and the functional importance of the differences is unclear.We hypothesize that inactive states can have faster ligand association rates, and that this is important for nonequilibrium processes, where the kinetics, or rates, of individual steps are more important than overall affinity because the process does not reach equilibrium. An example of a nonequilibrium process is cell adhesion. Because adhesive receptors bind to ligands that are anchored to other cells or surfaces, the adhesive bonds are subjected to tensile mechanical force due to cytoskeletal contraction, fluidflow-induced drag forces, or other stresses. This tensile force can only be applied between receptor and lig...