“…Flume experiments showed that increasing vegetation coverage can be related to restrained braiding and development of planform sinuosity (Gran & Paola, ; Tal & Paola, ). However, all of this evidence has been challenged on several fronts, owing to: (i) non‐unique solutions regarding whether vegetation promoted fluvial sinuosity in the early Palaeozoic or the opposite (Santos et al ., ; and ensuing debate in Davies et al ., ; and Santos et al ., ); (ii) the ever‐increasing documentation of pre‐vegetation alluvial strata that demonstrates a remarkable similarity in planform style (Santos et al ., ; Ielpi & Rainbird, , ; Santos & Owen, ; Went, ; Ghinassi & Ielpi, ; Ielpi, ; Ielpi et al ., ; Went & McMahon, ), channel geometry (Ielpi et al ., , ) and discharge regimes (Long, , , ; Nicholson, ; Ielpi & Ghinassi, ; Ielpi & Rainbird, ) with post‐vegetation rivers; (iii) alternative flume experiments where meander bends are maintained in the absence of vegetation (Peakall et al ., ), or where vegetation itself promotes flow disturbance, channel branching and eventual bar braiding (Coulthard, ); and (iv) the direct observation of modern, vegetation‐devoid fluvial landscapes capable of maintaining aggradational meandering channels (Li & Bristow, ; Li et al ., ; Ielpi, , ). In its broader sense, this debate represents a fundamental trial of uniformitarianism between modern and pre‐Silurian sedimentary landscapes, and could eventually disclose – or rule out – parallels between fluvial systems on Earth and other planetary bodies (e.g.…”